Author Archives: David Henshaw

Solar Panels PV

Home solar PV schemes – Letter

Solar PVA to B 80, October 2010

My mum has recently seen details of a company called ‘Homesun’ who offer to install solar power on your roof for free, you get any electricity you use for free, but they get the feed-in tariff. My mother is both very environmental, and not very well off, so this seems like a potentially good deal for her. On the other hand it is a 25-year contract, and although you can buy yourself out, it is straight-line depreciation, that is to say you have to pay half of the cost after 121/2 years and so on. Realistically my mother may not be alive in 25 years!

Do you know anything about this company, or this sort of scheme in general? She would have to pay £100 for a survey, which is refunded if you go ahead, but is not refunded if they say your roof is not big enough, or that there are issues of shading etc that mean they’re not very keen on your roof. So it could be a scam to get £100 out of lots of vulnerable pensioners, or it could be a perfectly bona fides scheme. Equally, if the feed-in tariffs are super, super generous, then it might be more sensible for me to pay £15,000 to have such a system installed on my mum’s roof, and to collect the feed-in tariff myself! I think her roof is about 26 square metres, and is close to south facing (slightly east, but not by more than 20°). Homesun would fit 18 square metres of solar panels.

John Wilson
Southend

Inevitably, with the arrival of the generous new ‘feed-in’ tariffs for small solar power generators, commercial companies have seen an opening, and these schemes have caused a flurry of interest, HomeSun and others being overwhelmed with enquiries. Basically, the company puts a solar PV system that would normally cost £15,000 on your roof at no cost to you, but keeps the feed-in payment, currently worth 41.3p for each Kwh generated, plus 3p for each Kwh exported to the grid. Commercially, the company is in a win-win situation. It will have to borrow a lot of money initially, but not as much as you, because it’s fitting the systems at cost price, yet taking advantage of a grant system designed to encourage individuals paying a full market price for the solar panels and other equipment. As the income from the government is guaranteed for the 25-year life of the contract, HomeSun is more or less guaranteed to make an excellent return. It doesn’t even need to gamble on the suitability of the site, because you’re paying them to do the survey. In John’s case, the site is close to ideal, as there is some evidence that a morning sun is more reliable, so panels slightly east of south make a better return.

You may be wondering what is left for the home-owner? As widely advertised, your mum will get to use any electricity the panels produce for nothing.This will cost HomeSun 3p for each Kwh she consumes, and save her about 13p per Kwh, which will be deducted from her normal electricity bill.

It all sounds very tempting, but for most people there are some serious disadvantages. The main problem is that you’re not always able to make use of your free solar power. Think how often you turn on the oven, washing machine, dishwasher, lights and other equipment when the sun is shining? If the sun’s out, the chances are most people will be at work, or out enjoying the fine weather. Under these circumstances, your free electricity will be exported, an extra 3p per Kwh will go to HomeSun and your neighbours will pay a market rate for ‘your’ electricity. The only way to make good use of the free energy would be to programme your washing machine, dishwasher and other equipment to come on by rotation during the day, but for the meagre savings, it’s unlikely anyone would be willing to go to that much trouble.

Clearly the HomeSun scheme is an interesting option for pensioners, the unemployed, or perhaps those registered sick, who are more likely to be at home, and less likely to have the capital to fit the panels themselves. They will be in a position to make good use of the free energy, with the option to buy the panels at a later date should they find the capital to do so. Thereafter – like all those who have bought their own solar PV panels – they will receive the generous feed-in payment whether they use the power or not, but obviously it would still make sense to use power-hungry equipment when the sun is out if possible.

For anyone else, these schemes would be a big mistake.With interest rates so low, solar panels are now one of the best investments you can make, so if you have money available, you really should invest yourself by loaning the purchase cost to your mum, or anyone else who wants solar panels and free electricity, but can’t afford to make the installation. Suddenly, you’re in the HomeSun business!

So much for new solar PV generators. Long-term readers may recall that A to B fitted solar panels a few years ago, when the generating tariff was very small. When the last Labour government announced the new feed-in tariffs, the small band of early-adopters were left in the lurch, although the Tory party faithfully promised to correct this anomaly once they were in power. In the event, the Tories found themselves in a coalition, and in the rather odd position of blaming the normally ‘green’, anti-nuclear LibDems for shutting the door on the people who blazed a trail for green power.

To quote Tory MP Oliver Letwin: ‘Chris Huhne [LibDem] very carefully considered the possibility of adopting the Conservative policy as a Coalition policy, but I am afraid that his investigations led to the conclusion that this would not represent value for money – and, indeed, his Department made clear that they would require an explicit Ministerial direction to do something that did not represent value for money if you were to pursue this policy.’

Some, but not all, of these early adopters received grants for the original installation, but it seems unfair that those who invested in solar power for philanthropic reasons are now receiving a lot less than those who have signed up with a prospect of a sound financial return. A politician’s promise is a delicate and fragile thing!

A to B 80 – Oct 2010

Loading

electric-bicycle-book

Electric Bicycles

Electric Bicycles BookElectric Bicycles covers all aspects of this rapidly growing form of transport and leisure riding. Chapters cover history and classic models and flops, types of electric bike and the technology used (including the low-down on batteries), conversion kits, why and how you might want to use electric bikes, bikes from around the world, emerging technologies, the latest on the legal position and much, much more.
Little known until recently, electric bikes are advancing rapidly, both in terms of popularity and technology.

David Henshaw has edited and published A to B magazine, specialising in folding and electric bikes, since 1997. Richard Peace is founder of Excellent Books, specialising in cycle publishing, and has been writing about cycling for more than 15 years.

Extra information and taster pages available at www.electricbicyclesbook.com

256 pages – 170 colour photos, graphs, diagrams and tables.

BUY HERE

Loading

East Coast Trains Doodle

A to B 87 Blog, December 2011 – Directly Operated Railways

A to B 87, Industry Gossip from The Mole: Directly Operated Railways

 

 

FIRST PUBLISHED December 2011
Directly Operated Railways

One does sometimes wonder what the expensive and disruptive privatisation of the British railway system was actually supposed to achieve. Greater efficiency, one assumes? The trouble with this assumption is that for nearly twenty years, we’ve had no publicly owned yardstick with which to compare the performance of the private rail franchises… until now.

Since National Express was booted off the East Coast franchise in November 2009, after contracting to pay a premium it couldn’t possibly afford, the East Coast franchise has been run by Directly Operated Railways, in reality a division of the Department for (Road) Transport, and thus, to all intents and purposes, the ghost of British Rail past.

East Coast Trains Doodle

According to the Free Enterprise culture much in vogue these days, the general expectation was that DOR would prove a cumbersome, rudderless whale, nibbled by lithe, efficient, free enterprise minnows. Nothing could be further from the truth, because DOR has come up with all manner of marketing innovations. It was the first franchise to introduce a loyalty ‘train miles’ scheme, offering free WiFi and First Class upgrades to regular travellers. Good idea. It also launched a concerted assault on competing airlines, with a campaign that included texting the phones of frequent business flyers using the airline’s own database, and advertising on WiFi at Edinburgh and Newcastle airports. Cheeky.

The campaign increased East Coast’s market share from 45% to 53% and won the company a Gold Award at the 2011 Media Week Awards.

Better Railways on the Continent?

Just the stuff we expect from private enterprise, but embarrassingly for those pushing the free enterprise line, DOR is nationalised. Maybe it’s an exception to the rule? We can’t be sure, because when our railway system was laughably ‘opened up to competition’, British Rail was not allowed to bid for franchises. Neither is DOR today, but bizarrely state-owned foreign companies are, and these mostly European railway companies now run nearly half of our rail franchises, and one of the three ‘Open Access’ operations too. French, German, Dutch, and now Spanish railway companies have expressed an interest in bidding for future franchises too, including East Coast, which the government is determined to let.

Incidentally, all of the foreign operators but Keolis (part-owned by French state operator SNCF, and currently responsible for banning folding bikes from Southern and SouthEastern platforms) have proved notably bike friendly. But only our own East Coast allows you to book a bicycle space when you buy a ticket on-line.

East Coast Trains
Unless you are a Daily Mail reader, you may not be particularly worried about Johnny Foreigner running our trains.You might even be quite pleased: German timekeeping, Dutch cycle-friendliness and French, er, style, are no doubt very welcome, but they do come at a price.

In 2010/11 DOR made a surplus of just under £200 million on the East Coast franchise, and being state-owned, it paid this premium straight to the Treasury, and thus to the Great British Public, knocking a few quid off our tax bills. Good news. Unfortunately East Coast is in line for privatisation, after which any profits above and beyond the franchise premium will go either to National Express and its slippery ilk, or the national governments of Germany, Holland, France or Spain, thus helping to keep their taxes down.

Is one being terribly naive in asking the rather obvious question that if a British state operator is doing very nicely at

…being state-owned, it paid this premium straight to the British tax payer…

present, it should surely be allowed to bid against foreign competitors when the franchise is relet in 2013? And if East Coast can do a perfectly good – arguably exceptional – job of running the line without a franchise, why bother going to the trouble and expense of putting these services out to tender at all? Why not keep this solitary state-run service as an efficiency yardstick against which future private and state-owned foreign bids could be assessed? If the state can do it better, why bother spending millions of pounds on lawyers, barristers and consultants in an endless round of refranchising?

What else do they do rather better on the Continent? Why yes, cycle policy of course, but that may be about to change. When the Department for Transport asked the Transport Research Laboratory to produce a report on infrastructure for cyclists, the car-minded civil servants were presumably hoping for a rubber stamp to the segregation of cyclists on railway paths and other dingy byways. But the report has actually come down in favour of keeping cyclists on traffic calmed roads: “Providing segregated networks may reduce risks to cyclists, although evidence suggests that the points at which segregated networks intersect with highways can be relatively high-risk, sometimes of sufficient magnitude to offset any safety benefits of removing cyclists from the carriageway… Of all interventions to increase cycle safety, the greatest benefits come from reducing motor vehicle speeds.” Used ‘Cyclists Dismount’ signs anyone?

A to B 87 Dec 2011

Loading

Strida MAS Edition folding bike

Strida MAS Edition

Leaf back through the A to B archives (on our web site at www.atob.org.uk) and you’ll see that we’ve come back again and again to the Strida. Designed by Royal College of Art graduate (and later lecturer) Mark Sanders, the Strida was produced from 1987-1992 at various sites in the UK, before moving to Portugal from 1993 to 1995, back to Britain in similar Mark 2 guise from 1998 to 2000, then redesigned and relaunched as the Mark 3, initially in the UK, but with manufacturer outsourced to Ming Cycles of Taiwan in 2002.

In China the number 4 is unlucky, so the next Strida was the Mini, with 14-inch wheels to suit the smaller Far Eastern riders who were increasingly the bike’s primary customers. Ming took over the rights to the Strida in 2006 and continued to develop the design, establishing outlets in Korea, Japan and the Netherlands, which isn’t surprising, plus France and the USA, which is. Given the Strida’s British lineage, it’s ironic that they are rare here, and purchases have to be made through the Dutch operation.

The Strida hasn’t sold in Britain in any numbers since Duran Duran were in the charts. Why are sales so weak? Like most folders, the Strida tends to suffer from the ‘Brompton’ effect, being designed and launched at about the same time, and having to fight Brompton for buyers ever since. The Brompton suffered from all the positive and negative attributes that come with small wheels, but it proved capable of doing a great deal more than commuting. It was heavier than the Strida, slower to fold and more expensive, but it could carry bigger loads and go a lot further and faster. To be fair, the Strida was never intended to compete in that area and was designed with a very specific brief: to fill the gap between walking and cycling. This is something it does very well.

Mark 5

Strida MAS Edition

The SpeedDrive is the magic MAS ingredient. You change gear by kicking the crank-arm covers.

It’s good to see Strida development continue apace after more than twenty years, and now we have the Mark 5, offered as three models.The basic LT looks much the same as a traditional Strida, but as on all the new bikes, the drum brakes have been replaced by discs front and rear. At 10mph, you won’t be able to take advantage of the improved cooling, but more usefully, they are less likely to bind (a common problem with the drums).

Up from the base model is the SX, which is similar, but with a polished alloy frame, 18-inch alloy wheels and Schwalbe Kojak tyres.The larger wheels and free-running tyres help reduce rolling resistance, and push the gearing up by about 25%, making the bike a lot faster in a flat urban environment, but even more gradient-challenged than the base model anywhere else.

Top dog amongst the Mark 5s is the MAS Edition, MAS being Mark Sanderson’s design company, still involved in a small way.This bike is 16-inch again, but reworked with a Schlumpf Speed Drive in the chain ring to give two gear ratios: direct drive, or a 1:1.65 overdrive.This gives gears of 40 inches and 66 inches, which may not sound very exciting, but two gears are a revolution in Strida terms, the previous bikes being encumbered with a single gear somewhere in the mid-50’s, which was neither low enough to climb modest hills or high enough to crack along on the flat when you had a following wind.

When we tested the Mark 2 in 1998, it cost £335 and weighed 9.8kg. Eight years later, the much improved Mark 3 had dropped to £220, and inched up to 9.9kg.These Mark 3 bikes were much more practical than their predecessors.They looked the same, but changes to the geometry made them far more rideable. In fact, we only really had two criticisms: the bikes were single-speed and the package – although reasonably compact with the new folding handlebars – was rather long.

With the MAS Edition, the gear issue has been cracked. But why has it taken so long? The difficulties involve the Strida’s trademark toothed rubber belt drive and trademark monoblade forks.The belt is oil-free and lasts more or less forever, but it can’t jump on and off pulleys like a derailleur, and you can’t fit a hub gear because of the monoblades.The only practical answer was to put gears inside the chainring, and there’s only really one gear system mounted at that end of the bike; the Swiss-made SpeedDrive.With a SpeedDrive costing much the same as a Strida, the price has long been a bit of a barrier, but the technology (like the bicycle) has now been licensed to the Far East, which has finally made it realistic to bring the two together.

The spec is better elsewhere too. Kenda Kwest 100psi tyres have cut rolling resistance to a commendably low level, and the better tyres allied to the improved Mark 3+ geometry, make the bike feel stable, secure and free-running.The little disc brakes are powerful and progressive, against the puddingy feel of the drums fitted to older bikes. Like all cheap discs, they rub slightly at first, but we managed to get the front wheel spinning freely with some gentle fettling, suggesting that in the longer term, the pads should run clear of the disc.This gentle rubbing is a common problem with disc brakes – not really an issue with a car, but with limited horsepower, it’s something a bicycle can do without.

The riding position is unique.You sit rather behind the pedals, which gives an almost semi-recumbent feel, and this, plus the straight, narrow handlebars, and the frame rising up between your knees, give the impression (not that we’d know) of riding a penny-farthing. Pulling away is easier because of the lower first gear, and after changing gear with a simple click of the heel on the SpeedDrive crank arm, the bike accelerates up to an unprece- dentedly high cruising speed.True, it’s only four minutes faster over ten miles (49 minutes against 53) than its predecessor, but they’re important minutes, bringing the Strida up from A-bike territory into the land of the living. Speed-wise, it’s in the same sort of ballpark as cruisers like the Giant Vida, and the MAS could even outpace a Mezzo D9 if it happened to come across one in original low-geared form. Something we’d love to see.

In MAS trim, the Strida no longer feels out of its depth away from the suburbs, and a ten-mile commute seems quite an attainable ride.We shouldn’t get too carried away, of course.The rubber drive belt, although admirably clean, adds a little friction over the good old steam-era chain, as do the ‘small’ 16-inch, 305mm tyres.These are actually 15-inch in diameter, and although the technology improves all the time, they’re on the small side for serious transport, and not best suited to rough roads, pot-holes or lengthy rides of any kind. Our bike also had a tight spot in its freewheel that rather spoilt downhill coasting, but we’re told these should run-in eventually. So although the realistic range of the Strida has rocketed from the original three miles, it’s still only ten miles or so, unless you’re quite masochistic. But as Mark Sanders would say, that’s plenty of range for a typical commute.

Folding

Strida MAS Edition

The Strida can be pushed along on its road wheels, a big advantage where the bike can’t be pushed or ridden.

Folding is much the same as it ever was, and it’s the sort of operation a Neanderthal could master after a few bruised knuckles. The only remotely complex bit is releasing the handlebar clamp. After that, there’s just one frame clip at the bottom-front corner of the frame triangle, and folding the pedals, which sort of splay in half, a pattern we haven’t seen before. The rear rack folds up against the saddle – something we’ve forgotten to do in the photo – but it makes little difference to the package size. Incidentally, we rode the bike with the saddle right back, but we haven’t included this in the folded size.

Once folded, the Strida produces a long thin package of W27cm x H50cm x L112cm. That’s a fraction shorter than the Strida 3, but quite a lot deeper, and a full 4cm wider, presumably because the SpeedDrive has a longer axle. The result is a package of 151 litres, or 5.4cu ft, weighing a reasonable 10.9kg… much of the extra weight presumably being down to the SpeedDrive. Not bad, and from some angles, very compact.

We’ve always treated the Strida’s long, thin package as being a bit inconvenient on a commuter train, but the times they are a-changin’. Bicycle space has become so sought after on peak hour trains that even Bromptons are starting to look a bit chunky. A machine that can be chucked in the overhead racks (the Strida is just about the only folding bike that can do this) may well be set for a come-back. And then there’s the thorny issue of railway companies forcing commuters to carry their bikes from the barrier to the train. True, the Brompton can be pulled along on its little rollers, but the Strida stands on its road wheels, so it can be trundled along on 15- inch tyres, a big advantage where the bike can’t be pushed or ridden.

Conclusion

The MAS is a fun, practical folding bike, provided you don’t want to carry a lot of luggage or go too far. The only real downside is cost. There are a handful of UK agents, or you can buy mail-order from the Netherlands, where the Strida LT sells for 478 Euros (£423 including delivery to the UK), and the MAS for 849 Euros… around £733 delivered. That puts it in the same sort of territory as the basic Bromptons, the Mezzo d9 or the Dahon Mu.These are all excellent commuter machines, but the Strida says something about you that a Brompton, Dahon or Mezzo never will. It’s not a bicycle, it’s a triangle, and a masterpiece of industrial design. Normally you’d have to pay just to look at something like this in a gallery. For less than five hundred quid you can ride it work.

Strida MAS Edition Specifications

Strida MAS Edition
Price £733 (Inc. UK delivery)
Weight 10.9 kg (24 lbs)
Gear ratios 40 & 66-inch
Folded Size H 112cm L 50cm W 27cm
Folded Volume 151.2 ltr (5.4 cu ft)
UK Distributor Strida Europe

A to B 80 – October 2010

Loading

Raleigh Dover electric bike

Raleigh Dover

Raleigh Dover electric bikeSo there’s now a British electric bike? Well, yes and no, but mostly no. To explain how and why this has come about, we need to blow some dust off the corporate history books.

Raleigh is (or was) a big British bicycle manufacturer that helped to keep the wheels of the British Empire turning for over half a century. It had divisions all over the world, one of the last being established in Germany in 1974. But by the 1980s, the company seemed to have lost its way, like so much of British industry, and it was sold by British multinational Tube Investments to the giant Derby Corporation of America.

This arrangement seems to have worked quite well, and the company even launched some innovations, such as the Select electric bike, produced with Sanyo in 1998. This was one of the first machines of its kind, but it was slow, with limited range, and at £1,000, it was too expensive. This glorious flop lead Raleigh to retreat from electric bikes altogether, and concentrate on MTBs and BMX bikes, the only serious money-spinners in the fickle UK market. As it turned out, they had missed a big opportunity.

Back in 1988, Derby had absorbed a small, near bankrupt German manufacturer called Kalkhoff, ultimately turning it around as Derby Cycles Werke or DCW, trading under the Kalkhoff and Raleigh brands in Germany. DCW seems to have been bursting with ideas, one of which was to pair the excellent Panasonic crank-drive power unit with some decent equipment and a quality roadster frame… this was the Kalkhoff Agattu, now also badged as the Raleigh Dover. By this time in the early years of the new millennium, the wonderful, but commercially unsuccessful Giant Lafree had been and gone, leaving the Agattu to slip quietly into its shoes. A classic had been born.

Bikes like the Agattu helped to kick-start an explosion in European electric bike sales and the Kalkhoff brand was cannily picked up by 50 Cycles in the UK. Having thrown away a lead of nearly a decade, Raleigh UK was blundering around looking for an electric bike partner, and in late 2006 it settled on a marketing arrangement with Powabyke.This was rather bad news, as Powabyke was still producing stodgy lead-acid electric bikes. So for a while, a customer walking into a UK Raleigh dealership would be pointed towards the agricultural Powabyke Shopper, while Herr Schmidt would be offered the svelte, sophisticated Raleigh-badged Kalkhoff. The collaboration did result in the Powabyke X-bike, which put a Powabyke motor in a light Raleigh frame, but it soon dawned on Raleigh UK that it was stuck with the tractors of the E-bike world, while its smarter, more innovative German cousin had control of the Bentley, or of course the Mercedes, as we must now call it, Rolls-Royce having gone the way of the best of British industry.

In 2007, Derby Corporation decided to concentrate on its core markets, selling the German DCW to an investment bank, so it’s now nominally a separate entity, but the Managing Director is still a Raleigh shareholder, and the company is still licensed to use the Raleigh brand in Germany. Confused? We quite understand.

Two years later, Powabyke went into administration (it was bought for a million pounds in October 2009 by Metroelectric PLC) and the hiatus gave Raleigh UK the excuse it needed to escape from the tie-in deal, and go for the much better German bike that already carried a Raleigh badge. A brash young team was assembled with a brief to get a Raleigh UK badge on DCW’s Agattu and set up a UK dealer network.

Yes, it’s a complicated story, but the upshot is that Raleigh has finally got the electric bike it deserves, and – crucially to this global player – it’s better than the eBikes marketed by Giant, Trek and the other big brands. More by luck than judgement, Raleigh has acquired the rights to an extremely good machine.

The Raleigh Dover

The Raleigh Dover As we gave the Agattu a good going over in A to B 63 back in January 2008, we’ll stick to the differences here, although there aren’t many. Kalkhoff was already selling the Agattu as the Raleigh Dover in Germany (embarrassingly, the German Raleigh bikes seem to be named after cities knocked about by the Luftwaffe), so it was a simple matter to bring the bike to the UK. If you’re looking to buy one, it’s almost identical to the Kalkhoff Agattu, but interestingly – and perhaps surprisingly – the Raleigh version costs £1,795, against £1,595£1,645 for the Kalkhoff, a premium of £150-£200. On the positive side, of course, you are paying for the reassurance of a big, well-trained, dealer network and a name that almost everyone will recognise. Mind you, the Agattu is one of the most reliable electric bikes around, so the dealers will – hopefully – have little to do. Meanwhile, the ever-canny 50 Cycles has wasted no time in adding ‘Like the Raleigh Dover’ to its advertising material.

Equipment is almost identical. In 2008, the Agattu was fitted with B&M Lumotec Senso lights, a skirt guard, Post Moderne sprung seat pillar and sprung front forks. Sadly, the frame lock and skirtguard have disappeared from the 2010 bikes, but the rest of the equipment remains as good as ever, with an upgrade from a 7- to an 8-speed Shimano hub. The only differences on the Raleigh are Schwalbe Advancer tyres in place of the Continental City Rides on the Kalkhoff, and a plain rather than sprung seat post.

Our Raleigh test bike feels much sprightlier than the 2008 Agattu, but that’s probably because the Agattu and Raleigh now share the sporty Pro-Connect’s 1:1.5 assistance ratio on the ‘High’ setting. It also feels ‘peakier’, meaning there’s less power when pedalling slowly, and progressively more as pedal cadence rises. This may be part of the same changes, or it may be some subtle reconfiguration for the UK, which Raleigh has hinted at. Either way, it feels annoying at first if you’re used to older bikes, but you soon get the hang of changing down sooner on hills and avoiding slogging along in a high gear. The general feeling is of a much sportier and livelier bike, and this is confirmed on our ten-mile test ride which the Raleigh knocks off in 33 minutes 15 seconds – nearly four minutes faster than the 2008 Agattu, and 45 seconds faster than the Pro-Connect.

It feels livelier on the road too, partly because of quick, light steering, but no doubt too because it’s quite light for a well-equipped electric: 21.6kg for the bike, plus 2.4kg for the battery. In reality, the speed is something of an illusion, because like all Panasonic-powered bikes the gearing is kept deliberately low to limit the maximum speed. Compared to the 7speed we tried back in 2008, first is much lower at 27.3″ (helpful for getting you home with a flat battery), and top is slightly higher at 83″ (previously 80″). That’s a touch low, but not low enough for your legs to become a frenzied blur at the maximum assisted speed of 16.6mph.

As regular readers will know, the top speed of crank-drive bikes is usually factory set by fitting a sprocket large enough for the motor to run out of steam at the legal speed limit, so if you like to go slower and/or climb steeper hills, you can easily re-gear it. Conversely, a smaller sprocket will make the bike go faster, which is technically illegal, but we think the police have better things to do with their time. As long as you don’t go mad, of course.

Back in 2008, our Kalkhoff Agattu had a range of 26.7 miles at 13.7mph on High, and the lighter, lustier Pro-Connect managed 31.5 miles at an average of 14.7mph. Today’s Raleigh (and, again, this probably applies to the 2010 Kalkhoff Agattu as well) achieved a median 28.4 miles, but with its higher gearing and peakier power output, average speed was a cracking 15.3mph. So the new bikes are faster and more economic than the 2008 Agattu, and a little faster or more economical than the older Pro-Connect. And all this is on full power. From experience, we’d say that 28.4 miles would equate to at least 31 miles on Normal power, and perhaps as much as 50 miles on Low.

Fuel consumption comes out at 10.9Wh/mile, and again, that’s more or less par for the course against the Kalkhoffs, and a very low figure for such a high average speed.

According to Jane, who knows the Giant Lafree well, the Raleigh/Kalkhoff has a more upright seat tube, which combined with bigger 28-inch wheels, and a relatively high bottom bracket, makes it impossible to get a straight leg riding position, and put a foot down comfortably at the lights. This does seem to be an issue with these big European bikes, and putting the saddle right back is only a partial answer. For now, Raleigh will only be importing the small 45cm (step-thru) and 53cm (diamond) frames, but if you really need something bigger (very unlikely) you can buy the Kalkhoff version.

Running Costs

One advantage of the widespread adoption of the Panasonic crank-drive is that quite a list of bicycles are now fitted with identical batteries, so if you’re in the market for a replacement, you can shop around. The primary brands in the UK at the time of writing are Emotion, Kalkhoff, Kettler, Monark and Raleigh. Raleigh admits it isn’t the cheapest for batteries and other spares, but there’s no obligation to buy from a Raleigh Ebike dealer. Like all other Panasonic bikes, the battery guarantee is two years, something that is gradually being adopted as an industry standard.

As far as we know (do tell us if we’re wrong) 50 Cycles is currently the cheapest for batteries, but be prepared for a shock, because it now costs £400. This is effectively the only running cost, but no one can yet say for sure how long the batteries will last. Pessimistically, we assume failure the day after the guarantee runs out, and on that basis, the Raleigh will cost 10.7p per mile to run. That’s better than average, helped by the high mileage per charge.

Conclusion

Watch out gents, the Raleigh is a big hit with the ladies. One who happened to be passing fell in love with it, Jane decided it was the first electric bike she would consider to replace the venerable Lafree, and Teresa already has a Kalkhoff… We ended up doing more mileage with the Raleigh Dover than anything since the Giant Lafree.

Where the Dover/Agattu really succeeds (particularly with the extra oomph in High power) is that it does the business for most of the people most of the time. It’s a big, elegant town bike, but it’s also fast enough to eat up the miles on cross country rides, and economical enough to go a long way. It has a low bottom gear to tackle Cornish/Yorkshire/Cumbrian gradients, and a high enough top to nip smartly across the big landscapes of East Anglia. The equipment is good enough for all-weather, all-year-round use, but the bike is still one of the lightest in its class.

All design involves compromise, and there are compromises here aplenty, but the Dover has few obvious weaknesses.You have to be a bit careful with gear changes, and without labouring the point, there remains a question mark over battery life and running costs, but for our money this machine really does continue to redefine the bicycle. The Kalkhoff Agattu is almost identical and cheaper, the E-Motion is a touch more efficient but limited by its gear options, and so on. But there remains a degree of loyalty to that Raleigh badge, despite the fact that there’s no British content.We think it will be a hit.

Specifications

Raleigh Dover £1,795 . Weight Bicycle 21.6kg Battery 2.4kg Total 24kg (53lbs) . Battery Li-Ion . Capacity 270Wh . Replacement £400 . Range 28.4 miles . Gear Ratios 26″-79″ Full Charge 6 hours . Overall Consumption 10.9Wh/mile . Running Costs 10.7p/mile Importer Raleigh www.raleighebike.co.uk info@raleigh.org.uk T 01773 532680

A to B 79 – Aug 2010

Loading

Batribike Micro Folding Electric Bike

Batribike Micro

Batribike Micro Folding Electric BikeORIGINAL STORY FROM AUGUST 2010. The Batribike Micro later ceased production, but returned in early 2013 as the Eego Nohak1. The bike seems to have been substantially revised, but the weight and performance appear much the same. Price and availability are not yet clear

Since electric bikes became widely available a decade or so ago, we’ve repeatedly advised avoiding folding electric bikes. The frames are made from cheap, mass-produced stuff and the bikes weigh more than some people can lift, even before the electric gubbins are added. Then the manufacturer bolts on a motor designed for a 26-inch wheel, giving 10mph performance, made worse by horrible spongy tyres. In theory, low gearing means good hill climbing, but the poor seating position and spongy tyres combine to make them monstrous machines – plain useless.

We’ve had a few turn up here, and sent them on their way after a short ride. The distributors are sometimes upset by this, but we courteously explain that the product is not fit for purpose, and thus next to worthless. If they want to keep promoting these things, that’s up to them, but we won’t go near ‘em.

The bottom line with new technology is to rate it against machines available today. Against similarly-priced powered or non-powered technology such as the Brompton or Dahon, is the new machine better? Is it cheaper? Lighter? Smaller? Faster? More reliable? Or perhaps better at climbing hills? Some of these bikes do climb hills (well, you’d hope so, wouldn’t you?), but most are found wanting in every category.

The Batribike

We’ve been aware of the Batribike Micro for a while, but we dismissed it until we had a chance to inspect one. Without being rude to our Chinese friends, it looked way too clever to be a Far Eastern design, and sure enough, the Micro originates with BB-Leisger, a rather obscure German company, apparently dedicated to developing innovative electric vehicles and outsourcing manufacture to its Chinese arm.

Sailing Today voted the Micro a jolly good buy, but we’re a little cautious of yachtie reviews, as they tend to involve a quickie round the marina then back to the RYC for gin and tonics all round. Everything seems better after a gin and tonic.

The saddle height is extremely low, but the bike feels more rigid and practical than it looks enough for a non-assisted folder, and is simply out of this world for an electric. According to the A to B electronic scales, that claim is a little optimistic, but not by much: the bike actually weighs 9.9kg (21.8lbs), which is still lighter than most conventional folders.

The claimed range is 1215 miles. Typically, electric folder claims have to be taken with a hefty pinch of salt, so we predicted somewhere in the region of eight miles. Astonishingly, the Micro exceeded that by a considerable margin, but we’ll come to that. First, some less satisfactory news.

As delivered, the Batribike Micro is unfit to ride. Whatever the trendy young German engineers might have specified on their CAD screens, the Chinese metal-bashers have interpreted it a little differently. There are two main problem areas: the saddle is much too low for most riders, and the handlebar stem/fork join, main frame joint and rear frame bushes are all extremely loose.We improved (but didn’t solve) the saddle height by fitting a Brompton saddle adaptor pin to the seat post, giving another few precious centimetres of leg room, and the main frame joint responded to a bit of adjustment, although that only really masked the play in the hinge. The rather dangerous stem joint (it could easily spin round on the fork threads) we thread-locked in place, which cured the problem, at the possible expense of making headset maintenance a hammer and chisel job, and we just ignored the rear frame play. The bike has a squidgy rear suspension at the back, a la Brompton, and play in the bearings is a nuisance, but no great danger. Having made the machine safe, Alexander was given the job of running it in, which he did with great enthusiasm (watch out, because children and teenagers love it).

The Micro has a number of innovative features that set it apart from the great unwashed mass of Chinese folders. The lithium-ion battery (a lowly 14.4 volts, but a reasonable 158Wh, which is all that matters) lives in the frame, where it should be safe from downpours and questing fingers. Control is by a neat little magnetic ‘key’, which is actually a small magnet on the end of a plastic fob.You bend this against the handlebars and the magnet presumably operates a reed switch inside: holding it down puts the motor at half power, releasing and re-engaging within a couple of seconds gives full.

The bike even has front and rear lights, but neither are legal in Europe on their own: the front LED is set into the frame, and pops on if you swipe the magnetic key at it, which is a great party trick. The rear LED sits on the top of the seat pillar, where it’s easily obscured by a long coat, and vulnerable when the bike is folded. Ours flew off and exploded into a million tiny bits as we put the bike on a train.

The motor is a chunky chrome disc which – clever again – forms part of the front fork, saving another smidgen of weight. Drive is by a straight-cut gear, which engages with similar teeth cut into the plastic wheel rim, where you might expect the brake blocks to go. There are teeth cut both sides, so if one side wears out (there’s no particular suggestion that it will) you simply turn the wheel around. There’s no front brake, but the Micro has a Vbrake on the back, and the front-mounted motor doubles as an electric brake when this rear brake is applied. Clever again, and saving yet more weight.

On the Road

The bad news is that we’re dealing with a single-speed bike, and as that single gear is only 51 inches, top whack will obviously be a bit compromised.We would suggest upping the gearing slightly, but the motor doesn’t have a freewheel, so a higher gear would only result in a lot of effort turning a dead motor. Talking of effort, the tyres are 35-40psi jobs, 14-inch at the rear and 12.5-inch at the front, although surprisingly enough, rolling resistance isn’t too bad. The biggest problem for a rider of 5′ 9″ is that the seat post is about a foot too short. Despite this major drawback, after a few turns on the shortie 155mm cranks, you’re nipping along. Press the magnet thingey against the alloy bars and the motor whines into action. This takes a bit of practice, because the ‘key’ needs to hit the right spot. In Low, there a gentle pull up to a stately 9mph, and in High, a slightly more urgent whine from the motor and reasonably nippy acceleration to 10.6mph; rather less than the 12mph claim.

This might not seem a considerable speed, and the lack of a freewheel on the motor means the poor thing gets a bit frenzied above 15mph, so you can’t even go downhill at any speed. But as we’ve found before, bikes like this are constant speed machines: you might only do 13mph down hill, but you’ll rarely do less than 10mph anywhere else.

On our largely flat ten-mile commuter ride, the Micro took 481/2 minutes, putting it way down with the likes of the unpowered Hemingway, A-bike and Strida, slower, much slower, than a good conventional folder, and a full ten minutes behind the slowest electric bike. That doesn’t sound very competitive, and it isn’t, but riding ten miles on an A-bike is hard and rather dangerous work, whereas on the Micro it’s a breeze. The little motor is only rated at 120 watts and can’t do much to help you, but it packs enough oomph to haul you up a 1:15 (6%) hill with quite gentle pedalling. If the hill gets steeper there isn’t much you can do to help, unless you have very short legs, strong knees, or stand out of the saddle. The Micro is quite noisy, because straight-cut gears always are, and in this case they’re grinding away out in the breeze.Without a freewheel, there’s no blessed relief from the racket when the motor’s off.

Ups and Downs

Going downhill, the rear V-brake is remarkably ineffective, and the front electric brake comes in with a bit of a jolt, which can be scary, although it’s less fierce at speed. This can be dangerous stuff: the brake is safe enough in a straight line on a dry road, but on a loose surface, or a corner, or in the wet, it could have you off in a jiffy. The principal is good, but practical electric braking needs a slightly cleverer approach – either a ‘soft’ engagement, or a real graduated brake feel. The brakes are important, because with no motor freewheel, there’s a risk of the motor flying apart at high speed and locking up the front wheel, so it makes sense to put a cap on it. We settled on 17mph, but saw 21mph once and lived to tell the tale.

The blurb implies rather vaguely that the front brake is a regenerative device, but it doesn’t recharge the battery. We can be quite sure of this because (a) the braking characteristics are all wrong, and (b) the regenerated power is being dumped into a great big resistor inside the handlebars, somewhere under the bell. Ride down a short steep hill with the brakes on, and the handlebars get too hot to touch behind the bell. If you really did try descending Porlock Hill, you could fry your breakfast at the bottom. Even on a modest hill you could burn your fingers if you gripped the bar at the wrong moment, so care is needed here. Imagine if you will, our tester traversing the Dorset downs, periodically crashing that electric brake into engagement to keep speed below 17mph, and the handlebars getting hotter and hotter… Too much braking and the bell will melt, too little and the motor might explode.We’re made of tough stuff here.

Climbing steep hills is much less exciting. The motor soon wilts as the gradient steepens, making 1:10 the practical limit, unless you have very tough legs. We actually achieved a 1:6 restart, but only by standing out of the saddle (not difficult, obviously) and riding quite hard all the way to the top. Average speed on our hilly 13.8-mile course comes out at a lowly 10.5mph; much lower than other electric bikes. But to be fair, several bigger machines have gone pop on the way round. The Micro just keeps plugging along.

Range

Riding the Micro is a bit of a yawn, even on High, but it does work, and it works quite well. If you live somewhere flat and enjoy a quiet and uneventful life, you might even choose to ride in Low, which will give significantly greater range and lower consumption.

Low-powered, low-speed electric bikes tend to be economical, and this one is no exception. After completing the hilly course on High, we kept going, and going and going, for a total of three hours. The final range was 29.7 miles at 9.8mph.Yes, we could probably ride those hills faster on a 3-speed Brompton, and so could most reasonably fit cyclists, but not everyone is willing or able to do that.

It’s hard to tell when the bike is about to conk out because the fuel gauge is without a doubt the most useless we have ever seen. It must have been something of an afterthought, because it isn’t mentioned in the handbook and we didn’t even spot it until someone set the bike running in a dark room.The gauge consists of three very dim blue lights on a sort of transfer fixed to the handlebars. How it works, we’ve no idea, but there’s nothing to get wet and no moving parts. The bad news is that they’re too dim to see in any sort of daylight, they point forward away from the rider and they only light up when the motor is running. Try spinning the motor up to speed on the spot (watch your fingers that cog could take one off) and it registers full because it needs to be under load to give a meaningful reading. Quite useless, but with that sort of range, who cares?

As the battery is in the bike, the neat little charger plugs into the front of the main frame, a full charge taking about six hours. The battery seems to be somewhat bigger than the manufacturer’s claim (again, rather unusual) with a capacity of about 190Wh, suggesting overall power consumption of 7Wh/mile, which is good going in hilly country and on full power. At 6.4p per mile, running costs are amongst the lowest we’ve seen, for a number of reasons: the bicycle is fairly cheap, as is the battery (it can be replaced at the importer’s workshop for just £150), and the range is very good for this sort of bike. The guarantee is for only 12 months, which is a bit limiting, but as the bike and battery are quite cheap, that’s not as bad as it sounds.

Folding

A simple fold-in-half machine, the Micro makes a small, if rather untidy package. The length of 69cm is OK, as is the height of 54cm, but the handlebars stick out awkwardly, pushing the width up to 49cm.This makes the ‘official’ size of the folded package a rather substantial 183 litres or 6.5 cubic feet, although in reality, the bike is light enough, and suitably shaped for squeezing into all sorts of corners.You can, for example, put it between the seatbacks on the train, and we even managed to scissor it either side of a glass screen on the train where a nominally more compact Brompton would never fit.

Carrying the folded bike is difficult because there are no clips to hold anything together, so you have to sort of bundle it into your arms. The technique is to stand grubbyside (cream linen trousers pressed against the chain ring at thigh height) and take the weight by the silver front frame, leaving the bars to flap about and poke passers by. None of this sounds very easy, but remember it’s lighter than most folding bikes, so a longish trek – up and down the Tube escalators for example – is easy enough. The bike comes with a shoulder bag, but putting it in is like wrestling with jelly, and the bulky bag is a hindrance when you ride away. In theory you could carry it, but in practice no…

Conclusion

There is a great little bike trying to get out here, but it’s effectively disguised. In practice, the short cranks and 79cm saddle height will rule out the Micro for taller people, and that’s that.The limited hill-climbing power will see off a few more potential customers, and anyone with reasonable oomph in their legs will be able to ride 25 miles on the flat without much more effort on any decent folding bike for about the same price.The same goes for average speed: on the flat, most people could ride faster on a 20-inch Dahon or Bike Friday.

That leaves a rather smaller market: short and lightish people (less than 80kg) who can’t put much effort into riding and need something for the mobile home. If you – or perhaps more importantly – your partner, is a weak cyclist and you want to chunter along the canal bank together, or enjoy the local Sustrans trail, it’s ideal.The Micro is easy to transport by car, bus or train, and if you don’t mind proceeding at a modest speed, it can give assistance for three enjoyable hours. It would be ideal for certain disabilities too. As long as you’re small, can balance on two wheels, and lift 9.9kg, this bike is a much more practical and entertaining proposition than a mobility scooter.

We could talk for hours about how it could be improved for the six billion people for whom it doesn’t quite fit the bill. With range to spare, a little more power wouldn’t go amiss, and a Brompton-style two-speed derailleur and reasonable top gear ratio would help too. Heavier surely? Not if you got rid of the unnecessary rear suspension. Bigger wheels would help in numerous ways – the diminutive 121/2-inch front wheel serves little purpose, because with the motor driving the rim, the wheel size is irrelevant to the gearing. We’d sort out the regen too: a great selling point, but only if it recharges the battery rather than toasting your fingers. Finally, the seat tube needs to be much, much longer, and to avoid folding problems, that means telescopic. If the manufacturers think we’re being harsh, we’re only trying to help refine a promising but rather flawed product. On the positive side, it’s the first folding electric bike we’ve agreed to test for several years, and with a few provisos, it actually works.With a little development, the Mark 2 could be very exciting.

Batribike Micro Specification

Batribike Micro £599 . Weight 9.9kg (22lbs) . Gear Ratio 51-inch . Battery Li-Ion Capacity 189Wh . Replacement Cost £150 . Max Range 29.7 miles . Full Charge 6 hrs Overall Consumption 7Wh/mile . Running Costs 6.4p/mile . Folded Size L69cm H54cm W49cm . Folded Volume 183 litres (6.5 cu ft) . Importer Fallowgate Ltd  www.batribike.com  info@batribike.com  01427 787774

A to B 79 – Aug 2010

Loading

Riese & Muller Frog Folding Bike

Riese & Müller Frog

Frog folding bikeMy word, we’ve been doing this a long time. Trawl back through the archives, and you’ll find a Frog test in October 2002, when Alexander’s Like-a-Bike was getting under the feet of security guards at the London Cycle Show. He’s now riding full-size bikes.

Riese & Müller is a German company, set up by young engineers Heiko Müller and Markus Riese in 1993, initially selling earmuffs, but moving on to bigger things. Like so many others, the pair set out on the road to folding bike nirvana, designing a neat folder with 18inch wheels called the Birdy. It was a rideable and rather clever machine, but like everything designed since the 1980s it came head to head with the Brompton and suffered accordingly. Built by Pacific in Taiwan, the Birdy proved a hit in its home German market and in the Far East, where it was marketed as the BD1, but less successful elsewhere.

R&M went on to design and market a number of innovative bicycles, and in 2002, very much to our surprise, the company launched a more compact folder called the Frog. It was a clever little bike, but expensive, and it wasn’t immediately obvious how it would attract sales from the bigger and more capable Brompton. It seems not to have done, because by 2006 it had been quietly deleted, but R&M continued to get requests from caravanners and other leisure types, for whom the longer-legged Birdy was altogether too big and unwieldy. As a result, the Frog was revised and reintroduced from December 2009.We’re taking a look at this interesting new machine.

The Frog

Compared to its predecessor from eight years ago, the Frog has changed almost out of recognition. The basic geometry is much the same, but like the Birdy, the frame is now made of hydroformed alloy tubing, rather than round and square tubes. The curvaceous tubes work well with the colour options of black or magenta; a shocking pink, guaranteed to draw a crowd.

Equipment-wise, the most important change is from 121/2-inch to 16-inch wheels. Back in 2002, we thought the 121/2-inch wheels worked surprisingly well considering their diminutive size, but in the real life cityscape of pot-holes and awkward kerbs, regular commuting would have been a nerve-wracking affair.

Most manufacturers seem to agree that the smallest useful wheel size is 305mm (16inch), and R&M have gone down this road, matching the wheels to ultra-wide 50x305mm Schwalbe Big Apple tyres. The Big Apple is a strange tyre. It looks heavy and sluggish, but in reality it’s quite the opposite, and in the bigger sizes at least, it offers very low rolling resistance. With such a massive cross-section, the tyres also offer a degree of suspension, making them an odd choice for the Frog, which has Birdy-style suspension – a leading link and polymer/coil spring on the front and swing-arm and polymer block at the rear. Still, with little wheels, you really do need all the suspension you can get, and compared to most 16-inch folders, the Frog has a real Rolls-Royce feel on ordinary roads. Jolly good. Oddly though, it’s not as proficient at climbing kerbs as we expected it to be. Hit a kerb too hard and the front wheel will bounce into the air. This is partly down to the short 87cm wheelbase, which also tends to encourage wheelies in the lower gears.

At 14.1mph, the roll-down speed was a bit lower than we expected (for comparison, think 15mph for a good Brompton or Birdy and 13mph for a tacky Taiwanese smallwheeler). Riding our ten-mile ‘commuter’ route gave a similar result: the time of 441/2 minutes put the Frog behind the Brompton, Birdy, new Mezzo D9 and 20-inch Dahons, but ahead of the Strida, the early Mezzo, and innumerable wierd and whacky machines, such as the ‘A’ bike. Not very impressive, although the sluggish performance might have as much to do with ‘stiction’ in the 8-speed Nexus hub as anything else. As delivered, the resistance in the hub was very noticable, but after running in for a few miles, it reached an acceptable level, although still much higher than one would expect from a typical hub gear.

When we tested the Frog in 2002, it was fitted with a light, simple 3-speed Nexus hub, although the rather low gear ratios of 35″, 48″ and 65″ were barely adequate for town use. Today’s 8-speed Frog has a more or less ideal spread, from a wheel lifting 27.4 inches to a reasonable, but not super-high 84 inches. That’s on paper. In practice, the resistance in the hub, and a rather tight chain tensioner, makes the gears feel somewhat higher than they are.You don’t really notice this until you come up against a Birdy or a Brompton (The Riese & Müller engineers will be tut-tutting into their morning coffees at this point), but in practice a Brompton with three gears can do much the same things as a Frog with eight, because the drive train (principally tyres and rear hub) runs so much more freely. If the Frog is being aimed primarily at the leisure market, we’d suggest a lighter, cheaper 3-speed option like the previous model.

In all other respects, the Frog goes and stops well. The powerful V-brakes are connected left lever to the front, right to rear, Euro style, so British riders have to take some care, especially as the bike has such a short wheelbase.You might get used to this, but lend the Frog to an unsuspecting friend, and they’ll be sailing over the bars the first time an old lady in a Ford Fiesta pulls out in front of them. The brake cables can be swapped, but we hear this leaves things rather untidy at the front. We didn’t try it.

Handling feels slightly odd at first, mainly because of the strange handlebar geometry, which looks (and feels) similar to the old Cresswell/Pashley Micro.That’s not really a criticism though.The suspension and geometry of the bike give a surprisingly stable, trusty feel – a real improvement over the twitchy, wayward handling of that original 121/2-inch bike.

Fit & Folding

The real strength of the Frog is its adjustability. The handlebars can be locked at five heights between 94cm and 102cm above the ground. The saddle has an even broader range of 63cm to 103cm, so you can more or less assume that anyone can ride the same bike after a momentary adjustment.

The folding process is similar to that of the Birdy, but without the latter’s derailleur gears, it’s an easier, more repeatable process because you don’t need to get the bike in the right gear to avoid a greasy chain incident. The only preparation, as with the Brompton, is to get the pedals in roughly the right position. Then the front wheel can be released from its suspension spring by pressing a little locking lever, and with the front of the bike held up, the front wheel can be rotated back to lock into a folded position. If the pedal is still where you left it (probably not), you can release the rear frame lock, allowing the rear frame, wheel and rack to swing forward in an asymmetrical manner – in other words, the hinge is offset, so that as the wheel goes forwards it ends up to the left of the front wheel. After a brief tussle, the front wheel settles against the rear wheel, allowing the main seat post to slide down, locking everything in place. The handlebars have their own quick-release, and fold down to the left against the rear wheel, while the telescopic seat pillar only needs to be dropped if space is an issue.

No, it’s not Brompton convenient, Brompton quick, or Brompton balletic come to that, but the steps are easy to remember, and a piece of cake after a bit of practice. The chain looks untidy, but it’s safely sandwiched between the wheels, and the only potential for grub is from grasping that front wheel early on. Fine if you keep your bicycles in as-new condition, but fury invoking of you’re folding the bike on the steps of the office just before a crucial meeting. Compared to the Birdy though, it’s a much easier, cleaner operation.

Folded size contains good and bad elements. The package looks lower than a Brompton, but at 60 centimetres tall, it’s actually the same height. It’s bigger in other dimensions too: 36cm wide (Brompton 28cm), and 84cm long (Brompton 60cm).You can reduce the length to 71cm by putting the saddle right down and turning it sideways, and in this slightly amended form, the bike has a volume of 153 litres or 5.5 cubic feet. That compares well to the 18-inch Birdy (7.4 cubic feet), but less well to the Brompton, which on a fairly conservative fold (ie, you can make it smaller on a good day) takes up only 3.6 cubic feet. Incidentally, the original Frog occupied 3.5 cubic feet, the difference being down to the significantly taller and wider wheels on the 2010 version. So the Frog isn’t quite as pace-setter as it once was, but it still gets into the exclusive super compact club.

Once folded, the bike has Brompton-style rollers on its rear rack, so it can be pulled around by the saddle with reasonable ease. The only problem is a distinct tendency to fall over to the left, which is odd, because most of the weight seems to be on the right. You soon remember to lean it up against something, and it’s not the only folder with this tendency, but it’s unfortunate nonetheless.

If it does happen to fall on you, you’ll be rubbing your leg for some time. Our test Frog weighed no less than 12.9kg (28lb), 2.5kg heavier than its predecessor. Mind you, the original Frog was little more than a frame and wheels, and our new bike has the optional propstand (waste of time), rear rack (useful), and mudguards (depends where you live). That sort of weight would be typical of a steel Brompton with all the extras, but it’s two or three kilograms heavier than the titanium jobs. And at £1,295 against £1,125 for a typical superlight Brompton, the Frog will inevitably be compared to the titanium machines.

Although longer than the Brompton, the Frog is one of the select group of bikes that fit between typical train seat backs

Conclusion

Back in 2002 we concluded that the Frog wasn’t a very practical machine, which it wasn’t, but that funloving types might be willing to part with £720 for one – a lot of money at the time. The 2010 model is a lot more practical, but it’s also a lot bigger, somewhat heavier and considerably more expensive.

Nevertheless, it’s still a fun machine. Everyone from old ladies, a group of passing soldiers, even kids on the local BMX track, says much the same thing: ‘cool bike’. And they really mean it. This bicycle exudes cool from every pore. To sum up, we can’t do better (which is a bit sad) than to slightly paraphrase our 2002 conclusion: ‘The Frog has fun in abundance, and if you still think it’s funny after parting with £1,295, it’s definitely the bicycle for you.’

Specification

Riese & Müller Frog £1,295 .Weight (with accessories) 12.9kg (28lb) . Gears Nexus 8-spd hub Ratios 27”, 34”, 39”, 44”, 52”, 64”, 74”, 84” . Tyres Schwalbe Big Apple 50x305mm Folded Dimensions W36cm H60cm L71cm . Folded Volume 153 litres (5.5 cubic feet) Wheelbase 87cm . Manufacturer Riese & Müller T +49 6151 366 860

A to B 77 – Apr 2010

Loading

E-motion 700 Deluxe

E-motion 700 Deluxe

E-motion 700 DeluxeThe E-motion is made by B H Bikes in Spain, or more accurately Bicicletas de Alava S.A. Now, we’d never heard of B H, which might be because they’ve yet to make much of a mark in the UK, and they specialise in racy machines.We’re talking skin-tight Lycra and shaven legs here. Dead serious.

However, the company does also produce a few city and commuter bikes, with names like Cambridge and London, and has recently adapted a few of its frames to accept the Panasonic power-assist system, now fitted to city bikes in almost every European country except, er, the UK.Well, we did have a word with Raleigh at last year’s London show, but no doubt they know best.

Once you’ve seen one power-assisted European city bike, you’ve seen them all, or so you might think, but with B H being something of a sporty brand, these are a bit different. As far as we know, these are the first mass-produced crank-drive machines to use a conventional derailleur, and as well as the step-thru and top-tube models one might expect, there’s also an aluminium/carbon fibre sports job weighing a claimed 16.8kg.

You might, at this moment, be thinking that power-assist on a lightweight sports bike would be at best a bit of a contradiction and at worst a travesty, act of vandalism, appalling desecration of this temple to human endurance, and so forth, depending on your strength of feeling. It does seem a bit odd, but there are several of reasons why you might want a bike like this.

The bikes that work best with power-assistance are generally the ones that work best, full stop. So if you want to go a long way at a decent speed, you’re much better off starting with a good European racing bike than a crummy Far Eastern excuse for a bicycle. And then, you might just want to show off, striding into work in your skin-tight Lycra with freshly waxed legs, but absolutely no sweat, demonstrating your remarkable virility.We make no moral judgements on how one might use the bike, merely that it is available for those who want such a thing.

If this bike was fitted with a hub motor, we would also say that the power was merely an add-on for hills, giving assistance up to 15mph, and allowing you to sail off at racing speed on the flat or – more pessimistically – the downhill bits. But the E-motion Sport has a crank drive, so the pedals are geared low enough not to exceed that speed by very much. They’ve ‘detuned’ it thus by fitting a relatively large 13-tooth top gear sprocket, although anyone with a modest technical knowledge will be to fit an 11-tooth sprocket in less than 10 minutes, making the bike much nicer and more practical to ride, yet still barely exceeding the increasingly ludicrous 15mph speed limit.

Obviously you all want to hear about this carbon fibre job, so perversely we’re testing one of the sensible commuter bikes, because we do so love practical machines. The range starts with the City 650 in either step-thru or top tube options, both with 7-speed derailleur and a relatively small 208Wh battery. Next up is the similar City 700 with 8-speed derailleur, followed by the 700 Deluxe, with 8-speed Shimano Sora gears, a better saddle, improved gear shifters, wheel lock, suspension seatpost, alloy pedals, front suspension lock-out, skirtguard on the step-thru and other tiddly differences. The important one is a larger 260Wh battery (as fitted to the Kalkhoff et al).This larger battery is also available as a £65 option on the cheaper bikes, and we’d say ‘buy it’. Our general advice is always to choose a battery capable of twice your normal daily range if possible. A big battery will have an easier life and last longer, and give you a little something in reserve for that deviation to Tescos, longer holiday trips and so on.

All the ‘sensible’ bikes in the range offer battery-powered lights of various kinds, a rack, and full mudguards, but there’s also a broadly similar ‘Cross’ version (you will be when it rains) bereft of all the useful bits, but with nicer gears.At the top end, the Sport models have flat-spoke wheels, Shimano Tiagra gears and carbon forks, plus drop handlebars on the Deluxe variant, which might be a first on an electric bike.All variants sold in the UK come with a Mach 1 speedometer.This is a basic device, without Ride Time or Average Speed, but fitting it is a really nice touch that we’d like to see repeated elsewhere.

Prices are comparatively modest.The 650 or Cross cost £1,350, which is only a shade more than the basic Panasonicdrive 3-speed Monark Eco, or somewhat inferior Giant Express or Ezee Torq.The 700 costs £1,400, and the 700 Deluxe £1,550, undercutting the Kalkhoff Agattu, mid-range Giant models, Kettler, Gepida and – most importantly of all – the Kalkhoff Pro-Connect.The Sport comes in at £1,650, or £1,800, which sounds a lot, but it’s some £500-£600 cheaper than the similar (but allegedly unrestricted) Kalkhoff Pro-Connect. Is this all too good to be true? We’ve tested the £1,550 City 700 Deluxe to find out.

On the Road

The 700 Deluxe is the first electric bike we’ve tested for a while to attract favourable comment from friends, relatives and passers by.We often hear phrases like ‘How useful’, ‘Goodness that’s practical’, or ‘How much?’, but the E-motion had everyone drooling. Like most of the 2009 bikes, it comes in either white or black (fortunately ours was the latter) and it looks and feels like a normal, if slightly heavy, sporty hybrid with some unusual echoes of the 1930s in the handlebars, and frame graphics that wouldn’t look out of place on a BMX.

This model has a suspended seat post, which feels slightly at odds with the sporty nature, and front suspension forks, but these can be locked out on the right sort of road surface, generally sharpening things up. For our money – unless the daily commute involved tracks or city potholes – we’d go for plain forks and a lighter bike, and keep a few quid safe in the bank (well, maybe not).The suspension is the main reason that the E-motion 700 Deluxe weighs 23.3kg, which is a respectable weight, but 2.3kg more than the rigid, but otherwise very similar, Kalkhoff Pro-connect. A definite disadvantage.

Power-assist is the now widely fitted Panasonic crank-drive, but in this case, almost uniquely, power gets to the back wheel via a conventional derailleur rather than hub gears.We were a bit concerned about this at first, but there’s no technical reason why a derailleur shouldn’t be able to handle the extra torque, which is no greater than a serious athlete or a spirited couple on a tandem might produce.All the same, a little bit of extra care is needed when shifting, especially changing up, or at low speed.With High power selected, the change is smoother if you relax pedal pressure briefly when changing gear. Because the motor takes a fraction of a second to disengage, there is still plenty of power there to effect the change, but without any nasty noises, which can happen if you’re standing on the pedals. In the lower settings, or with power-assist turned off, change gear as normal.

Gearing is everything with these crank-drive bikes. As standard, the E-motion bikes come with a 14-28 tooth gear cassette, giving an overall gear range of approximately 41″ 81″ (or just 38″ – 76″ with the 650, which has smaller 26-inch wheels).Without power, 41″ would be ludicrously high for hill-climbing, but power-assist makes this sort of gear viable, if a bit marginal if you live somewhere hilly.Top speed is a shade over 15mph, and that’s all you’re allowed.

Range is certainly something to write home about.As a rule, these Panasonic-driven bikes manage somewhere between 25 and 30 miles depending on gearing, rolling resistance, weight, and so on. Following the same hilly course we ride with all the electric bikes, the E-motion achieved an unprecedented 35.6 miles at an average of 14.2mph in High. In the default Medium setting, the bike ran for 38.2 miles at 13.6mph, not the fastest ride, but a considerable mileage. Both those results are a shade slower than its nearest rival, the Kalkhoff Pro-Connect, but four to five miles greater range.With this standard 41″ bottom gear, the bike restarted on a 1:6 hill, but only just, and a weak rider might well have been defeated.The 81″ top gear is high enough to give assistance up to 15mph, but the general feel is a bit uninspiring. On the positive side, the range in the Low power setting will be quite substantial – certainly in excess of 50 miles.

Our bike also came with an alternative set of cogs, although the distributors are at pains to point out that they wouldn’t dream of suggesting this as a road-going alternative, and what the customer does with it is entirely up to them.An 11-30 tooth cassette hardly sets the world alight, but it widens the E-motion’s gear range to 38″-104″, improving the bike across the board.Top assisted speed on the flat increases to 17mph, but as we’ve made clear on numerous occasions, these are not powerful motors, and typical assisted speed will be closer to 15mph, so the illegality issue is a purely technical one.

With these alternative cogs, the bike feels much more capable, with a reserve for climbing hills, and a tall enough top gear to pedal in comfort up to about 22mph when conditions allow. In High, range is cut to 28.2 miles, but speed bounces up to 15.3mph, so in this trim, the E-motion is faster than the Kalkhoff, but with slightly inferior range. Swings and roundabouts, unfortunately. In the Medium setting, range is 31.7 miles at 14.1mph, and perhaps a little over 40 miles in Low, which isn’t a huge scary penalty. With the lower first gear, restarting on the 1:6 hill is fairly easy in High, but in the lower power settings, you really need that first gear to get up the hills.

On our standard 10mile commuter run, the regeared E-motion made the fastest run of any crank-drive, with a speed of 32 minutes, some two minutes ahead of the Gepida and Kalkhoff ProConnect. Our advice is definitely to go for the wider gear range.The higher speed helps the bike tackle the ups in those annoying short, sharp ups and downs, and if you want economy you can still get it by using a lower power setting, or turning the power off altogether in top gear.

Power consumption is 8.18.7Wh/mile with the 14-28 tooth sprockets, or 9.8-11Wh/mile with the 1130 tooth which is definitely state-of-the-art, and jolly good, considering the high average speed. Interestingly, we were expecting to see a clear advantage over the hub-geared Kalkhoff bikes, but this wasn’t really the case.The E-motion is faster and more economical than the slightly frumpy Agattu, but more or less on a par with the sportier Pro-Connect.As derailleur gears are measurably a shade more efficient than hub gears, we can only assume that the Pro-Connect’s excellent Continental Contact tyres offer slightly lower rolling resistance than the Schwalbe Energizers fitted to the E-motion. In any event, the difference amounts to no more than a percentage point or two. Incidentally, the Schwalbes punctured twice within a few miles after taking whacking great thorns in the sidewall, whereas the Continentals didn’t puncture at all for the period we had the Pro-Connect. That might mean everything or nothing.

Charging and Running Costs

Charging is exactly the same as for any other Panasonic-powered machine.A full charge takes around 51 /2 hours, and the charger is a bit bulky (although much smaller than the Yamaha device). Running costs are kept low by the two-year battery guarantee and the high mileage per charge, but hindered by the £395 battery replacement cost, and we won’t see that come down until the pound perks up.We estimate running costs of 10.8p on the default Medium power setting, rising to 11.1p in High.As ever, our figures rather pessimistically assume the battery will need replacing the moment the warranty expires.

Incidentally, all the Panasonic batteries are interchangeable, so if you own any of these bikes, feel free to shop around for the best battery deal.The other money-saving option is the smaller battery fitted to the cheaper E-motion variants.This 208Wh battery costs £350 to replace, but it offers at least 20% less range than the big ‘un, and may need replacing more often, so the relatively small price differential suggests that the smaller battery would be a false economy, unless you make short trips at low speed.

Conclusion

Unusually, this is quite an easy one to sum up.The E-motion has lots of potential competitors, but the primary one is the Kalkhoff.The E-motion has a clear advantage in terms of price, and the only other real question is whether you prefer hub gears or derailleurs.The Kalkhof’s hub gears are much the best option in town, and changing the overall ratios is easy and cheap by swapping a single rear sprocket.You can make big changes too – very low gears for exceptionally hilly areas, or very high ones for the Norfolk polders.

The E-motion’s derailleur gears provide slightly closer ratios and an arguable efficiency boost, but they can be a nuisance in traffic, and although the sprockets can be mixed-andmatched to produce a custom gear set, the upper and lower limits are strictly fixed. On a normal bike the chainring (or rings) could be swapped, but with the Panasonic crank-drive, this component is not changeable, so your options are constricted by the biggest and smallest rear cogs offered by Shimano: a big 34-tooth or thereabouts to get you up steep hills, and a small 11-tooth for easy cruising in top. So in very hilly, or very flat areas, the Emotion is not quite as flexible, and probably isn’t suitable for hills in excess of 1:6, unless you are quite a spirited rider, in which case it will be fine.

Taking all this into account, it really has be a draw. Competition is a good thing, and the Kalkhoff now has a worthy adversary.

E-motion 700 Deluxe Specifications

E-motion 700 Deluxe £1,550 . Weight Bike 20.9kg Battery 2.4kg Total 23.3kg (51lbs) Gears 8-speed Shimano derailleur . Gear Ratios (Standard) 41″ – 81″ (Alternative) 38″ – 104″ Battery Lithium-Ion . Nominal Capacity 270Watt/hours . Replacement Cost £395 Range (Standard Gearing) 38 miles . Full Charge 51/2 Hours . Overall Consumption 8.1-11Wh/mile Overall Running Costs 10.8-11.1p/mile . UK Importer OnBike www.onbike.co.uk tel 01299 251514 info@onbike.co.uk

A to B 72 – July 2009

Loading

Brompton Sparticle Folding Electric Bike

Brompton Sparticle

Brompton Sparticle Folding Electric BikeORIGINAL STORY FROM FEBRUARY 2009. The Sparticle has been considerably revised since.

Finding a good motor kit to electrify the Brompton is a bit like the hunt for the Holy Grail. I was, no doubt, as excited as many other Brompton owners when the June 2007 A to B announced that the age-long search could be over with the arrival of the Nano. This looked a great kit, ticking many of the problematic boxes that had thus far stood in the way of designing a suitable system. It was reasonably light (in terms of folding electric bikes that is) and the kit didn’t interfere with Brompton’s world beating fold. Unfortunately,it appears the designers have simply been unable to keep pace with demand and it is now all but impossible to get hold of a Nano-Brompton. Enter the Brompton Sparticle, designed by the Cambridge-based Electric Transport Shop, and about to be launched as we went to press.The trial prototype I was loaned came ready assembled, although you won’t be able to buy complete bikes off the shelf like this you’ll need a donor Brompton to which the kit can be fitted by ETS or yourself. Could this be the bike with miraculous Grail-like powers? A viable motorized Brompton, as A to B noted in the original Nano review, combined with train and bus, holds the key to ‘almost any inhabited area of the UK being within easy reach of almost any other’ – using only bike and public transport.

What’s A Sparticle?

A quick nose round the internet suggests that the Sparticle hub motor is something called a Suzhou Bafang, probably the 500-watt model used by Wisper, rather than the more powerful version used on the early Ezee Torq. Those motors are 36-volt,whereas the Sparticle uses a 24-volt system,so too many parallels shouldn’t be drawn. However,it seems the motor has an established pedigree, which is a good start.The rest of the kit – a sturdy looking controller box and a battery which resembles a small plastic handbag – is fitted underneath the seat,clamping around the seatpost. The battery itself slides off the control box when not in use,reducing the overall weight by more than 3kg to around 16kg .As a 12-stone,reasonably sporty,40-year-old,this is fine for me to lift above my head onto train luggage racks and like – if this sounds too heavy,you could shave a couple of kilos by going for a lighter Brompton than the M3L (which the prototype was fitted to).

Folding Fudge

Whilst the first thing you’d probably ask about on most electric bikes is ‘what’s it go like?’ – details of speed, hill climbing ability and the like – the first thing many Brompton owners would surely ask is ‘how does the kit affect the fold and the weight?’. The weight query I’ve looked at – 16-19kg isn’t too bad for an electric bike. The fold appeared to be fine as I lifted the bike out the box and unfolded it.The size has increased with the addition of the seatpost-mounted controller adding some 100mm to the height.But something is certainly adrift even once the seat is raised the rear of the bike doesn’t swing back if the bike is lifted – as you would expect without the seatpost effectively locking the rear frame in place.You have to unhook the front of the bike for this to happen. I couldn’t initially figure out the source of this invisible power working against gravity.Indeed,I rather belatedly realised what should have been obvious on getting the Brompton out the box – even in its fully folded state,the bike shouldn’t theoretically hold together,though it does. With the control box effectively raising the seat pillar height this will not fully lock the rear of the bike and provide a fixed anchor for the front.So why doesn’t it just spring apart like a crackerjack out of a box? A closer inspection up on the workstand revealed what was going on.The Sparticle uses wider, bespoke forks,to accommodate the hub motor.When clipped over the rear frame they provide what appears to be a friction fit – already this strong fit has begun to rub the paint off the rear frame.Whilst this appears to work,I certainly wouldn’t want to rely on it to keep the folded bike together time and again.Indeed, strongly shake the folded bike and it does indeed disassemble itself.Several emails to the designers established that the Sparticle needs to be fitted with the long Brompton seatpost (designed for taller riders) which, I was assured,had been used on other prototypes and locked the folded bike together perfectly.This still appears somewhat of a fudge in design terms – you end up with a folded Brompton bigger than a standard model and you rule out very short riders,for whom the extended seatpost is not suitable because it starts to stick out of the bottom of the frame. The most obvious solution to this would be to adopt the Nano design of a barmounted controller that could be disconnected from a battery hidden within the Brompton’s own front-mounting pannier.Unfortunately the controller box used here appears to be an ‘off the shelf’ model designed only to fit to seatposts.Whilst the designers have taken the time to have bespoke forks made for the kit,it’s a big pity they didn’t do the same for a controller box that would mount elsewhere,so as not to compromise the classic Brompton fold.

The Ride

Like the majority of electric retro-fit systems,the Sparticle is a simple throttle-controlled twist-&-go;you can use the thumb trigger to ease the power on and off at any speed up to about 14mph, when the power all but disappears.This rather limited top speed has a very useful upside though – it appears that the motor is actually geared for a 20-inch wheel, and the effect of putting it into a 16-inch rim is to substantially increase torque – in other words quick acceleration off the mark.That’s extremely useful for nipping in and out of stop-start town traffic and up steep gradients when you’ve got tired legs. In practice this meant only gentle pedalling was required for a very nippy throttle-assisted start.The real power kicks in at about 5-10mph and I streaked away up the gentle hill outside my house with very little pedaling required to maintain 14mph.On longer rides I failed to find a gradient that would defeat the Sparticle – it would even crawl up 1:7 hills from a standing start without pedalling, though this clearly isn’t recommended. This ‘power on demand’ characteristic would probably suit your average Brompton rider well – he or she is likely to regularly buzz through town traffic, and bike/train commuters no longer need to fear that killer climb up from the station that might be an unpleasant end to a tough working day.It will also no doubt be very handy for Bromponites who load a weekly shop or a toddler onto their bike – extra weight is always most telling up hills and this is just where such torque would be useful. With these motor characteristics it felt quite natural to let the motor take most of the strain accelerating briskly up to cruising speed – somewhere above 10mph depending on conditions – then ease off the motor power and let your legs do the relatively easy work of maintaining the speed.I found the power harder to use into nagging headwinds and up gentler but relentlessly constant gradients.You find yourself easing the throttle on, deciding you are using a bit much power and then easing it off again – hardly the most efficient riding style. Still,my test area around West Yorkshire proved ideal Sparticle country – flat stretches where no motor power is required,punctuated by what are generally short but steep hills up to around 1:5. The Sparticle loved to eat these up,with only gentle pedal pressure applied along with full throttle – producing a similar physical effort to cycling on the flat. Riding without power,I found myself forgetting that a motor was actually fitted – the motor’s freewheel seems to add very little resistance over a conventional hub.If you want to extend battery life and don’t need to tackle difficult gradients (and don’t trust yourself to lay off the throttle) there is a small plastic limiter screw underneath the controller (with a rather vague feel and easily mashed up under light screwdriver pressure) that lets you restrict power output – very noticeably at its bottom limit.

A Battery Of Facts

Phylion-branded batteries are used here – a brand associated with a batch of failures on Ezee bikes in the past. Not wishing to stir up trouble between Phylion and Ezee – each seems to lay blame at the other’s door – it seems the best summary of the situation is to say that there is at least a question mark over the reliability of Phylion batteries.Without measuring the current drawn by the Sparticle it’s hard to say if they are being overloaded (allegedly the problem on the Ezee bikes). It really needs a long-term test of the batteries on this system in real world conditions to see if they are behaving as they should.Watch this space. The control box which the battery slots onto is linked to motor,throttle and handlebar ‘Displayer’ via wires that are bundled to the rear brake and gear cables. Battery charge state is shown by two sets of lights,one on the battery and the handlebar-mounted ‘Displayer’ unit. The latter proved totally useless and should be dispensed with – all six lights stay on until the last couple of miles before flunking out alarmingly quickly. The battery indicator is marginally more useful – the first of three lights goes within about 3 miles but it takes until around 25 miles to drop to one light,and once the final light goes you still have about three miles left (all ‘Displayer’ lights still on at this stage!). As the battery is mounted behind you,the battery lights are tricky to check on the move,so the mileage here is approximate.The battery finally gave out at 39 miles after being used on a variety of around-town tasks.A very decent range,thanks to energy consumption of 9.5Wh/mile – good,but not quite as good as the Nano-Brompton’s 7.7Wh.

Conclusion

Good electric bike, shame about the rather crude fold,would be my initial judgement. Given that this was a prototype it would be nice to see some of these comments taken on board for the final production version, which I haven’t experienced. There will be those Brompton owners who won’t give this kit a second glance because of the increased folded size and the need for an extended seatpost. But those currently struggling up steep hills or with large loads might be tempted if they can live with the compromises the kit entails.Unlike the Grail’s promised powers, the Sparticle won’t imbue you with spiritual purity worthy of a great warrior,let you heal the sick or confront universal evil,but it could save you a lot of huffing and puffing and a good deal of time.

Brompton Sparticle Specification

Brompton Sparticle kit only £750 wheel-build option £80 fitted to Brompton £70 . Weight ML3 Brompton plus motor (typical) 15.7kg battery 3.3kg total 19kg (42 lb) . Battery 24-volt Li-ion Capacity 290Wh . Replacement Cost £250 . Charge time 5hr 40min . Range 39 miles Running Costs 10.1p/mile . Electric Transport Shop Tel (Cambridge) 01223 247210 (Oxford) 01865 243937 (London) 0207 4822892 Richard Peace A to B 69 – Jan 2009

Loading

Monark Eco electric bike

Monark Eco

Not long ago,crank-motors looked like an endangered species,but suddenly the Panasonic drive is everywhere,doing rather well against more powerful machines on the race track,yet very much a favourite on city bikes too.It’s that flexibility that makes a crank drive so useful.The last three electric bikes we’ve tried have been crank drives,and all have used the same Panasonic Li-ion system.It’s now by far the most popular crank drive system worldwide,and is possibly unique in having a two-year battery guarantee. After the various Li-ion battery problems of the last few months, that’s quite reassuring. The latest machine to reach our doorstep is the Monark Eco.It’s unlikely you will have a Monark in your shed,because they are rare in the UK,but in Sweden the name is synonymous with cycling,rather as Raleigh used to be here. Actually, Monark is more like Pashley, because it produces the Swedish post bike and numerous other practical load-carriers. Raleigh,of course,is run by corpulent suits importing Chinese MTBs,whereas Monark (now part of the Cycleurope group) actually makesthings. With Chinese manufacturing becoming increasingly expensive in terms of wage rates and shipping,the manufacturing ball will soon be very much back in the European court…Bad news for the UK,of course,because we’ve wiped out our industry,but mainland Europe is doing well,and that’s why electric bikes are flooding into a hungry UK market from Holland, Germany,and now Sweden.

Monark bikes are typical North European machines;practical,slightly frumpy,and equipped with back-pedal brakes,wide puncture-resistant tyres and very few gears.The Eco is no exception.It has a one-size step-thru alloy frame,Panasonic powerassist,3-speed Nexus hub gear,and a chunky rack for carrying your girlfriend home from the va?a?rdshus after a few jolly fa?a?rsko?o?ls.

The Monark Eco

On the road,the Monark feels somewhere between the solid and meticulously equipped Gazelle,and the lighter,sportier Kalkhoff.The machine weighs 24.6kg,only 10% of which is accounted for by the tiny Li-ion battery.That’s average for a crank-drive bike – it’s heavier than the Kalkhoff Pro Connect,but lighter than the Gazelle or Kalkhoff Agattu.The 1.9-inch tyres give an unstoppable steam roller impression and roll pretty well, provided they’re pumped up hard enough.If the tyre pressures are low (they’re rated 4065psi) the rolling resistance can rise appreciably and the handling becomes a bit wayward, made worse by some flex in the very low step-thru frame.Even at higher pressures,the Eco has a tendency to wag its tail above 30mph,but,let’s face it,that’s not a speed you’re likely to encounter on a city bike of this kind.

The three-speed Nexus is simple,light, cheap and easy to adjust;a transmission design classic in other words.Three gears and a range of less than 200% is perfectly adequate on an electric bike,even somewhere quite hilly,but the gears are a bit widely spaced for the Panasonic motor, which prefers to buzz along at a fairly constant speed.In a flat city this will matter not one jot, but in Cumbria,the Eco would struggle a bit on awkward climbs.

Monark uses this hub quite widely on its conventional bikes,but we’re a bit concerned about its longevity on a crank-driven electric machine,which produces the sort of torque you’d expect from a tandem.And as the motor can be a little slow coming off the power when changing gear,you do have to change rather slowly and precisely to avoid grunts and bangs from the hub.This sort of thing is OK once in a while,but do it too often,and the hub will fail relatively quickly,a fate that befell some Giant Lafrees.

Generally speaking though,it’s a practical and pleasant machine to ride,the simple hub gears and powerful motor making mincemeat of city traffic queues.Even out on the open road,the Monark nips along pretty well,although the narrow gear range does limit the top speed and climbing ability.Despite the rather high 41-inch bottom gear,we found a restart on our 1:6 hill relatively easy on the High power setting,but only just doable on Medium.If you live somewhere hilly and have limited leg power, you’ll certainly want an electric bike with a lower first gear.At 76 inches,top is just adequate for spinning along on the flat.As we found with the Kalkhoff Pro Connect, the new Panasonic motor is chirpier than its predecessors,giving a smidgen of power up to quite high leg cadence,so despite the low gearing,assistance is available to around 16mph with a fresh battery.This doesn’t sound very exciting,but the bike is lively enough,and the power boost encourages the rider to pedal faster.Odd thing,human psychology.

Range & Charging

We ride all these electric bikes on a fairly hilly course,including a handful of long, steepish climbs and a short stretch at 1:6.On the Medium setting,the Eco managed no less than 34.8 miles,a shade more than the Kalkhoff Pro Connect and the greatest range we’ve seen from a crank drive,other than on the Economy setting.In practice,you would probably get less in city stopstart traffic,but a little more in the wide open spaces of East Anglia,so it’s a realistic figure.Average speed is 13.6mph;significantly lower than the Pro Connect,but only to be expected with the lower gearing.

On High,over the same course (but on a rather blustery day),the bike managed 29.3 miles at a slightly higher speed,but this setting is certainly preferable in the Great Outdoors,as it gives the bike a bit more zing to tackle those demoralising steep little climbs.We didn’t have the bike long enough to find the full range in Low,but as with the Kalkhoffs, we’d guess that 50 miles would be possible in the right conditions.

Obviously,13.6mph is at the low end speed-wise,but the Eco nips along pretty well,completing our shorter,flatter ‘commuter route’ in a very reasonable 36 minutes,which equates to just under 15mph.On longer, slightly more challenging rides,14mph is fairly easy to maintain.So the Eco’s low gearing gives better range and a lower average speed than most, but generally speaking,the performance is typical for this drive system.

Charging is just as for the Kalkhoff Pro Connect,and all the other recent Panasonicequipped bikes.The battery is more or less full after five hours,but it continues to take a trickle charge for a further hour before cutting off.The capacity seems to be a genuine 260Wh or even more,something born out by the fairly impressive mileage figures.Clearly Panasonic’s watt/hours are bigger than most.We’ll say no more about that…

Equipment

With the Eco’s roadster origins and £1,200 price tag,it’s reasonable to expect decent equipment.The XACT stand is a little lightweight for an electric bike,but it’s the first we’ve seen with an adjustable leg,which can be screwed in and out by hand – useful for fine-tuning the stand angle when carrying shopping,for example.The SNG V-brakes work well enough,but we spent a lot of time getting them bind-free,partly because the wheels were poorly trued,but as our bike is an advance sample,this should improve.In classic north European style,the rack is nice and solid,but beware of carrying a friend wearing floaty chiffon,because there’s no skirt-guard…odd for this sort of bicycle.

The Eco has no suspension,relying instead on those balloon tyres and a Selle Royale saddle with great big springs under it, which make some odd creaks when you pedal hard.By and large,the rigid front forks are good news,but we’d rather see a suspension seat post than a squidgy saddle,although you might disagree.Riding with less air in the tyres will give a smoother ride,but as we’ve already said,the handling and rolling resistance can be compromised.With full pressure,pot holes can be a bit spine jarring,but the bike floats over cattle-grids and the like very nicely.

With just a single frame size,the fit of the machine will be a bit of a compromise for the short and tall.The saddle spans a height range of 92cm to 106cm, the low end being just adequate for a rider of 5′ 3″ and the top somewhere in the six-footsomething region.The bars start at around 92cm and are adjustable for both height and reach,thanks to one of those stem adjustment-thingies.

The front dynohub is a SRAM ILight D1,which looks the part,and works well,but appears to offer a little more resistance than some,although that shouldn’t matter too much on a power-assisted bike.The dynamo works the front light,a rather plasticky Basta halogen,which gives out plenty of yellowish light,but is not a patch on a good modern LED lamp.The rear light is a simple auto LED device called an H-Goggle Auto…yes,another brand we’re unfamiliar with. A Trelock rear wheel lock and chunky steel mudguards make up the package.By British standards,the Eco is equipped to the gunnels,but in Germany or Holland,the lack of a pump,skirtguard and LED headlight might be considered a bit mean.

Longevity

As we’ve said more than once,the Panasonic drive system and battery come with a twoyear warranty,which is good news if you’re nervous about modern battery technology, and in this case the bicycle is also guaranteed for two years.Incidentally, our machine threw its chain within a few minutes,something the Kalkhoff Pro Connects have done,both on our test and during the Presteigne Tour.A brief investigation revealed that the chain tensioner pivot needed lubrication,and a few drops of oil cured the problem – a useful tip if it’s happened to you,because these units should be100% trouble-free.Hopefully someone in Osaka will have their bottom smacked,because this small error must have caused numerous warranty claims.

Elsewhere, there isn’t a great deal to go wrong, apart from that question mark over the durability of the Nexus hub.These bikes are designed to be simple and rugged,like the post office bikes they’re loosely based on.

Conclusion

Once upon a time,we thought £900 was a lot of money for a bicycle,but we’ve got accustomed to four-figure price tags,and with petrol at £5.50 a gallon,the public seem to be catching up with the idea too. Yes, you can buy an old car, or a new Chinese moped, for less, but a quality power assisted bike brings all the attributes of the bicycle with the bonus of assistance.

At £1,250, the Eco is currently the cheapest of the ‘quality’ bikes, undercutting the Giant Twist, Kalkhoff Pro Connect, Gazelle, Heinzmann, and Sparta.The only competition comes from the Kalkhoff Agattu,currently also £1,250,but only in the medium frame size. The Eco is not as well equipped as some,but it’s reasonably light,sportier than you might expect and has the makings of a rugged and reliable town bike,capable of longer journeys when asked.If you have discounted shopping by roadster because of hills,look again!

Specifications

Monark Eco £1,250.Weight Bike 22.1kg Battery 2.5kg Total 24.6kg (54lbs)Gears 3-spd Shimano Nexus hub . Gear Ratios 41″ – 76″ . Battery Li-ion Manganese Nominal Capacity 260Watt/hours.Replacement Cost £295.Max Range 29.3-50 miles Full Charge 6hrs . Consumption 6.4-10.9Wh/mile. Running Costs 9.0p-9.7p/mile Manufacturer Cycleurope Sverige AB www.monark.se UK distributor IDASS tel 0844 8009310 mail info@battery-bike.co.uk

A to B 67 – Sep 2008

Loading

Kalkhoff Agattu Wave electric bike

Kalkhoff Aggatu Wave

Kalkhoff Aggatu Wave - A to B reviewKalkhoff Aggatu Wave. FIRST PUBLISHED IN A to B 63, January 2008

Not long ago, when the innovative Giant Lafree was discontinued, we began to wonder if the electric bike had any future, other than as a rollerskate for lazy leisure riders. When Giant replaced the Lafree with a crude hub motor system, it looked as though the wonderful Panasonic power unit was dead, and with it the dream of quality, economical power-assisted machines. Why is this system so wonderful? If you live somewhere like Cornwall or Cumbria and you’ve tried a Giant Lafree, you’ll know why. The Panasonic, almost uniquely amongst electric bike power systems,assists at the pedal crank, which makes it very good at climbing hills: when you change down to a low gear, the motor automatically changes down too. The result is a bicycle that’s more or less conventional in every way. It weighs little more than a non-assisted roadster, and feels similar on the road, but come to a hill and the bike gently swishes up at something like double the normal speed. When you’re faced with a steep hill with two heavy panniers of groceries, the bike will chug sedately up.

The Aggatu

Fortunately, the reports of the death of the Panasonic were exaggerated, and for that we must thank our cycle-friendly cousins in Holland and Germany, whose factories kept the faith when the Taiwanese had moved on to building other, tackier, things. We tested the Gazelle Easy Glider in A to B 61, and mentioned in A to B 62 that Raleigh-Univega in Germany had introduced a range of equally well presented electric bikes using the same system,much to the confusion of Raleigh UK, where the suits had just signed a deal with Powabyke.

It turns out that the Univega is actually a ‘badge-engineered’ version of the Kalkhoff Agattu. All these brands were once part of the Derby Cycles mega-corporation, but when that pyramid collapsed a few years ago, some some seem to have gone their own way, while others remained under a reformed Derby umbrella. So we think that Kalkhoff and Raleigh Germany are the same thing, but distinct from Raleigh UK, which is something different, but seems to share a logo. Anyway, who cares? All that really matters is that the Agattu is lovingly handcrafted in Germany with most of the technical bits coming from Japan, and in engineering terms, that’s jolly good parentage.

The Agattu is a typical sensible European roadster,available in two forms; the step-thru Wave and the diamond-frame Diamant. The electric option is new for 2008 – a stock Agattu fitted with the latest 260Wh version of Panasonic’s lithium-ion power unit. The bike weighs a reasonable 23.3kg (51lb),plus a battery of 2.5kg, giving overall weight of 25.8kg (57lb). That’s lighter than the Gazelle,a shade lighter than the Schwinn Transit, but heavier than any of the Lafree variants, which goes to show that the technology hasn’t moved on that much.

Like the Gazelle, which shares similar technical bits, the Kalkhoff is practical, well-equipped and capable – in short, it’s about as good as a bicycle gets. The machine is fitted with Shimano’s Nexus 7-speed hub, which is ever so slightly disappointing, because the Nexus 8-speed is demonstrably better, but gears are less important on an electric bike, so you’d have to live somewhere very hilly to miss the extra gear. Like all Panasonics, the power-assist is simple to use. Jump on the bike, pedal off, and it rides like any other, but press a button on the small handlebar switch and the fuel LEDs and power meter light up. From your next pedal stroke until the battery is exhausted, progress will be assisted.

Unusually, there are three levels of assistance. Default is Medium, giving 1:1 assistance (in other words, the bicycle exactly matches your leg power), but you can choose Low (1:0.5) or High (1:1.3) if you prefer. On this free-running machine, Low is more than adequate for a flattish town, the effect being somewhat akin to a normal bike with a gentle tailwind. Medium is more like a typical power-assisted bike, but a little weak at low pedal/motor speed, so you have to make good use of the gears to get the best out of the system. High power is basically the same, but with increased grunt at low speed.

In all cases the motor assists up to about 15mph (more like 16mph with a fresh battery), and like all crank-motor machines there is the disadvantage that the top gear is capped by the manufacturer to prevent the motor assisting beyond this speed. However,crank motors are easily tuneable by simply replacing the rear hub sprocket. The standard sprocket has 22-teeth, giving ratios more or less evenly spread between a lowish 33-inch and a highish 80-inch. A larger sprocket (not easy to find) will give lower gears for hills, and a smaller one will enable the motor to assist you up to an illegally high top speed, but don’t get too excited, because these are low powered machines. Experience with the Lafree suggests that 17 or 18mph is about top whack. The optimum gearing depends on rider weight, fitness level and topography.

Riding our largely flat 10-mile commuter route on High power gave a time of 37 minutes, which is noticeably faster than the similar Gazelle Easy Glider, but broadly typical for an electric bike. On our hilly test circuit, undulating between sea level and 500 feet, the motor feels quite meaty on High, pulling well from low speed, and hanging on to the high gears for longer (typically two gears higher than on the Medium setting, if that makes any sense). The bike gallops up hills in a most satisfactory manner, giving an average speed of 13.7mph, which is on the high side,but not spectacularly so. The Agattu walked away with the 1:6 (17%) restart,and easily changed up into 2nd gear after a few metres. The maximum gradient is hard to judge, because we don’t have anything steeper to try it on, but like the Gazelle, we’d guess the bike would climb 1:4 (25%) without giving the rider a heart attack. Overall range on the High setting is 26.7 miles.

On the same circuit, Medium feels a bit over-stretched. In easy conditions, the bike feels quite chirpy, but the motor has a lot less torque at low speeds, so when the gradient really bites, you find yourself changing rapidly down through the gears, using 2nd,or even 1st on quite modest hills. A restart on a 1:6 hill is possible, but you really need that 33-inch 1st gear, and you won’t progress into second without strong legs. The trade-off is a battery range of 30.2 miles; one of the best results we’ve seen, even under these quite trying conditions. Average speed is a rather leisurely 12.7mph, which is almost identical to the Gazelle Easy Glider on its Low power setting, albeit over a greater range.

In typical Panasonic style, the battery has a stack of five fuel warning lights, but you can’t see these on the move unless you hop off and press a button on the casing. In this case, there’s also an array of three LEDs on the handlebars. These give an accurate indication of the power left in the battery, but they’re not very linear. Typically, the first light pops off at 71% capacity (Kalkhoff claim 40-70%), the second at 36% (claimed 10-20%), and the last light begins to flash at 27%. According to the manual there should be less than 10% capacity left at this stage, but there’s enough juice for another eight miles, so no need to panic. When the battery really is down to its last 10% a battery-saving mechanism cuts the power right back, so if you’re planning to climb a steep hill 28 miles from home, you probably won’t make it. That said, a range of thirty-odd miles is pretty good, especially from a battery weighing only 2.5kg.

We normally ignore Low or Eco power settings because as a rule they don’t do anything you can’t do with your legs alone. But when we tested the Gazelle,we felt the lower power setting was genuinely useful. And Low on the Agattu is even lower…

According to Radtouren magazine, three Kalkhoff engineers achieved a record 101 miles on Low back in August 2007, but this was at 12.5mph, on a level track, under carefully controlled conditions. In the real world, mileage is much less exciting, hill-climbing rather feeble, and average speed a bit uninspiring (much the same as a conventional bike, albeit for less rider effort). But as we clocked up the miles, we really began to value this gentle power option. It’s valuable for parts of a journey where full assistance isn’t needed, and you can easily switch back to the higher settings for hills and headwinds. It’s also useful if you, a weaker cycling partner, or an elderly relative needs a small boost to keep up with other cyclists. On this free-running bike, the very low assistance level really is useful. For the record, we achieved a range of 47.6 miles at 11.2mph – reckon on a bit more in warm weather, or a bit less if you ask for extra power on the hills.

Economy is excellent, but disappointingly, the bike doesn’t break any records on the higher settings, consuming 11.8Wh/mile on High, and 10.3Wh/mile on Medium (a shade more than the Gazelle which managed 9.9Wh/mile). On Low the Agattu hits a new low of 6.5Wh/mile, but as the rider is putting in two-thirds of the effort, this isn’t a very meaningful record. All the same, these are pretty much state-of-the-art figures. In layman’s terms, it will run all day on the energy Jeremy Clarkson consumes boiling an egg for breakfast.

Equipment & Charging

Charging is a touch slow. Importer 50 Cycles reckons the battery should be fully charged in four hours, but it actually takes between five and six hours. This misunderstanding probably arose because the handbook suggests the battery is full when all five charge lights are illuminated, but our test equipment showed that there was more than an hour to go at this point. As there’s no other indication of a complete charge (the falling temperature of the charger gives a clue) it makes sense to leave the battery on a bit longer, but don’t over-do it, because Panasonic says battery life may be compromised if it’s left connected for more than 48 hours.

The charger is rather large more of a docking station really, so it’s not readily portable – but a compact travel charger is expected in summer 2008. Bearing in mind Panasonic’s troubles with UK-issue Lafree chargers, will all this new technology prove reliable? It’s certainly a neater, lighter, more weather-proof battery/motor unit than the original one. We can’t guarantee it will be reliable, but the signs are good, and a company like Panasonic has a lot to lose if it doesn’t work.

Other equipment is excellent, and almost as classy as the Gazelle Easy Glider, but not quite.The Kalkhoff Agattu comes with an Abus wheel lock, pump, skirt guard, long-legged ESGE stand, Post Moderne sprung seat pillar and Verso sprung forks. These are rather good, giving a well-damped, but resilient ride. Cattle grids just disappear, as do small kerbs, although the big ones can give you quite a jolt through both the forks and the sprung seat pillar. The forks are adjustable,and on this very rare occasion the adjusters demonstrably do something, but there’s little point in stiffening up the ride too much with an electric bike.

Unusually, for a bike equipped with Nexus hubs, the Agattu has V-brakes, also by Shimano and excellent: squeal-free, powerful, and progressive, but not as weather-resistant as the rather spongey Nexus roller brakes one expects on this sort of machine.

The lighting system is in the 9/10region: Busch & Muller Lumotec Senso Plus headlight and Selectra Standlicht at the rear. Both have a standlight function, which is not only a safety bonus, but extremely useful, the front light being strong enough to guide the bike into a dark garage or find a house number. Both work on a sensor system, which cuts in and out unobtrusively at dawn and dusk, but the hub dynamo absorbs so little energy, there seems little point in turning it off, in the winter at least. The road illumination is good, although not quite up to the standard of B&M’s LED headlight. We also had an intermittent problem with the rear light, which always worked perfectly at home or in town, but would sometimes cut out on country roads…

The big chunky Continental CityRIDE tyres (42 x 622mm) inspire great confidence and despite being rated at only 65psi, they roll pretty well too,with a roll-down speed of 14.7mph. That’s fast enough to give the bike a light, rideable feel, something very few electric bikes achieve.

Like all good European designs, the Kalkhoff comes in no fewer than five frame sizes: 45cm, 49cm, 53cm (our test bike) and 57cm for the step-thru, and 49cm, 53cm, 57cm and 61cm for the ‘gents’. For former East German shot-putting ladies, a ludicrously large XXL version of the Wave will be available in a few months with a stronger 61cm frame.

Running costs depend very much on how you use the bike,varying between 8.7p/mile for gentle shopping trips to 10.2p/mile riding hard on High power. The difference, incidentally, is a matter of battery depreciation and range per charge. A spare battery costs £305 and we work on the basis of 350 charges in a lifetime (Panasonic claim 500 charges).

Conclusion

Transport decisions are not always logical. In a perfect world, everyone would do their shopping with a bike like this Kalkhoff and traffic congestion would melt away. It can be ridden day or night, summer or winter, wet or dry, tail wind or head wind, and it will always carry your groceries home. But relatively few people will buy an Agattu, which is a real shame, because if you haven’t ridden a well-equipped power-assisted European roadster, you are missing a seriously top-draw experience.

And so to price.The 2008 Gazelle Easy Glider has better spec and the same motor and battery for around £1,600, whereas the Agattu is being introduced at £1,195, albeit rising to £1,250 in the spring. It may not be quite as classy as the Gazelle, but it’s an excellent price for a competent European machine – similar to the most expensive Chinese electric bikes and cheaper than the Lafree in its final form. Not so long ago, you had to travel hundreds of miles just to see a brand like Gazelle or Kalkhoff, but both manufacturers are busy setting up dealer networks in the UK… Are we witnessing the much-prophesised roadster renaissance?

Kalkhoff Aggatu Wave Specifications

Price £1,195
Weight Bike 23.3kg Battery 2.5kg Total 25.8kg (57lbs)
Gears 7-spd Nexus hub
Gear Ratios 33″ – 80″
Battery Li-ion
Nominal Capacity 260Wh
Replacement Cost £305
Range 26.7-47.6 miles
Full Charge 6 hours
Running Costs 8.7-10.2p/mile
Manufacturer Derby Cycle Werke GmbH www.kalkhoff-bikes.de
UK distributor 50 Cycles tel 01509 266656 fiftycycles@50cycles.com

A to B 63 – Jan 2008

Loading

Gazelle Easy Glider

Gazelle Easy Glider

Before its untimely withdrawal last year,we considered the Giant Lafree a jolly good electric bike – arguably the best you could buy.The magic ingredient was the Panasonic crank-drive unit,which placed the motor ‘upstream’ of the hub gears,so the motor worked via the gears:Whenever your legs felt the strain,you’d change down a gear,automatically easing the load for the motor too. Bio-feedback,if you like.This very efficient arrangement made the Lafree a superb hill-climber that was also one of the most economical electric assist bikes on the market.The only real downside was stress on the gear system,which had to deal with tandem-plus power levels.

For various reasons – chiefly cost – Giant axed the Lafree,and dropped the Panasonic system too.The replacement ‘Twist’ model (see A to B 58),was equipped with a conventional hub motor.This bike had its strong points,but against the lightweight,free running,hill-climbing Lafree,it was rubbish.Panasonic was already marketing a new crankdrive unit, utilising a lighter,more compact lithium-ion battery,which Giant had used briefly on the Revive semi-recumbent (A to B49),but there weren’t many other takers outside Japan,and it began to look as though this excellent crank-drive system was dead.

Fortunately,Dutch manufacturer Gazelle had the faith to incorporate the Panasonic mechanism into its Gazelle Easy Glider,which was released a couple of years ago,rapidly becoming one of the best selling electric bikes in the cycle-friendly markets on the Continent. This is the bike that Giant could,and should,have made,but it’s made in Holland – is the Gazelle the new Lafree?

The Easy Glider

As a general rule – and generalities can be dangerous – cyclists of the non-technical kind love bikes with the Panasonic drive system.There’s no twistgrip,and no awkward power adjustments or scary flashing lights to worry about.You either don’t turn it on and ride a normal bike,or you turn it on,and the bike magically adds hidden power to your pedal strokes.If you don’t know what that feels like (and don’t knock it until you’ve tried it) it’s a bit like riding with a tail wind.Not a gale,but the sort of pleasant summer breeze that is guaranteed to put a smile on your face.Come to a hill and the whole character of the machine changes.The speed gradually drops as you change down through the gears,but the level of assistance increases,so although hill-climbing speed is generally quite modest, the bike feels as though it can climb anything,and with the right gearing it will.

We have to slightly qualify this,because the new system fitted to the Gazelle Easy Glider is not quite as powerful as the old one.For reasons possibly linked to the demands of the domestic Japanese market,Panasonic has gone for quite a low-key power system on the new crank motor,with a choice of relatively small batteries.Wisely,Gazelle has chosen the biggest 187Wh version for the Glider,but it’s still a bit mean in terms of output.On the other hand,the battery weighs only 1.9kg,a mere handbag against the weight of a typical Dutch roadster,the Easy Glider weighing a total of 28.2kg,including motor, battery and numerous accessories.For transport boffins,and collectors of facts and figures,the battery weighs less than 7% of the gross weight of the bike – a remarkably low figure,and the equivalent of a full tank of petrol in a 1,000kg car.

On the Road

Power assist is launched via a push button on the handlebars.First impressions are that the bike is heavier and slightly weaker than the Lafree,but not by a great deal.It also seems crazily low geared, but that’s a side-effect of the crank-drive system and Euro regulations.With a crank motor,maximum assisted speed is proportional to the gear inches in top,set in this case at 78″ to make the motor run out of steam at 15mph.The downside is that it’s difficult to pedal faster than about 18mph without your legs going round in a frenzy,but the good news is that first gear is very low indeed.As with the Lafree,you can fine tune the characteristics of the bike by fitting a different rear sprocket,and a smaller sprocket will raise all the gears slightly.This is technically illegal,but the motor really isn’t powerful enough to pull a speed much above 15mph,so don’t worry too much about getting a blue light on your tail.Slightly higher gearing will give the bike a more relaxed laid-back feel that should suit it better, and have little negative effect on hill climbing.

Once up to the jaunty 15mph cruise,there’s not much to say about the way the bike rides,which is good news. There’s our usual grumble that gears 7 and 8 on the Nexus are almost identical,but with eight rather low gears,and power assistance,you tend to miss most of them out anyway in normal riding.On the flat,the bike pulls away best in gear 3,followed by 5,possibly 6,then 8.As the hills close in,it’s much the same in reverse – the bike copes with many inclines in 6th and quite steep ones in 4th.We found a restart easy on a 1:6 gradient and even managed to get up into 2nd.In 1st,given a spare battery,this bike should grind up any hill in the British Isles,from long Scottish 1:8s through the short sharp 1:4s of the North Yorkshire Moors,to the switchback 1:6s of Devon and Cornwall.If you live at the bottom of one of the these,the Gazelle really is your best option.More powerful electric bikes can storm up steep hills with a bit of careful planning,but riding the Gazelle you can stop and talk to Mrs Johnson halfway up,or pause to look at the scenery,then pull cleanly away again.With this sort of bike,hills might slow you down,but they won’t bring you out in a sweat,and you won’t be walking.Riding our largely flat 10-mile commuter route,the Gazelle achieves a comfortable 14mph,completing the course in 381/2minutes. That’s up with quite fast conventional bikes,but only average for a power-assisted machine.Against its top end electric bike competitors,it’s muchslower than the Ezee bikes, slightly slower than the Sparta Ion, but notably quicker than the stodgy Giant Twist,the replacement for the Lafree.

The ride is very good,with adjustable front suspension forks that really are adjustable for damping (not enough in our opinion),and a suspension seat post under the derriere. This combination is compliant enough to more or less eradicate cattle grids and small kerbs,which is an odd feeling,but suspension only has so much travel,so don’t go mad.If you ask too much – particularly of the seat post – the result is a nasty bump and a crash.In general,the Easy Glider rides extremely well,with an air of solidity,and rock-steady handling at speed,even hands off.Not quite Rolls Royce stuff,but amongst the best.

Brakes are Nexus roller,front and rear.Shimano has done a good job of answering the criticisms of brake fade on long descents,and a lack of ‘feel’,but they’re still a bit of a compromise.Slightly unsettlingly,the roller brakes don’t seem to do anything when first applied,as it takes a few microseconds for the brake force to reach full strength.In an emergency,you squeeze a bit harder,resulting in an over-fierce application when the brakes do come on.We managed to briefly lock the rear wheel at 30mph when the car in front braked suddenly at the bottom of a steep hill (twit), resulting in the Glider giving a momentary wag of the tail.Having experienced roller brakes before,we can only say that they should get better with age,so don’t worry too much,but bear it in mind.

Range

Although the battery is small and light,it has a nominally bigger capacity than the Lafree 187Wh against 156Wh.But it’s a demonstration of just how unscientific (or,indeed, meaningless) these battery ratings are,that the range is about the same at 19.5 miles (our various Lafree tests gave averages of 18.5,20 and 22.9 miles).Similarly,the Gazelles’s 13.2mph average speed is right in the middle of the Lafree figures of 12.8,13.2 and 14mph. So whatever our initial impressions might have suggested,the performance of the Gazelle is very much on a par with the Lafree.And with a battery weighing only 1.93kg and measuring a compact 25cm x 10cm x 9cm,carrying a spare will not be a serious issue.In fact,you’d hardly notice the weight or bulk of two spare batteries,giving a total range of 60 miles.

We repeated our mileage test on the ‘MIN’ setting,engaged with another stab at a small handlebar button.Normally,we ignore these low power settings,but this one works rather well,and we’d like to see a ‘super-minimum’ as well.As far as we can tell (the effects are subtle) you have to pedal a bit harder before the motor will cut in,and the power is limited when straining at low pedal/motor speed.In practice,this encourage you to ride in a more economical way – spinning the pedals faster in lower gears,and generally making better use of the gearbox – and that’s where the extra mileage comes from.In MIN,you really do need to use all the gears for best results,but the bike isn’t much slower overall (12.6mph against 13.2mph) and range increases by nearly a quarter,to 24.1 miles.For such a small speed penalty,that’s an attractive trade-off. Incidentally,the handlebar control unit is supposed to flash an LED light at you when the battery capacity drops to 10%,but it comes much later than this – typically anything from a few hundred metres to a kilometre before the thing conks out.There is a five-LED array on the battery,but you can only see this by hopping off and pressing a button, so it’s only a guide.

If maximum range is important to you,Gazelle will be releasing a larger 260Wh battery early in 2008.On the basis of current performance,that should give a range of 27 to 33 miles.

Overall efficiency (including charging losses) is similar to the Lafree,but without breaking any records.On full power,consumption is 12.3Wh/mile,and on MIN the Gazelle just breaks into the exclusive single-figure club at 9.9Wh/mile.If you’re still sceptical about the green credentials of these machines,bear in mind that a gallon of petrol contains around 41,000Wh of energy,and will only heave a Nissan Patrol 25 miles or so. On the MIN setting,the Gazelle Easy Glider achieves a little over 4,000mpg

A more topical comparison is carbon dioxide emissions.Generating one kilowatt/hour of electricity in the UK results in emission of 0.43kg/CO2.So if you recharge on a conventional mains tariff,the Glider will average 2.7g-3.3g CO2per kilometre,or zero if you produce your own power (a typical 4×4 emits 300g/km).Running costs – mainly depreciation and the £209 replacement cost of the battery – come out at 11.5p per mile.

The charger is the same pattern as the old Panasonic charger,but now clips onto the battery with a sort of clumsy cassette thing.Charging is pretty typical,taking 4 hours and 40 minutes for a complete refill.Like the Lafree, the battery has to be removed for charging, but in this case,the battery key is the same as the rear wheel lock key.This means you have to lock the bike in order to release the key and remove the battery,which you may or may not consider a good thing.More positively, the key is (or should be) always to hand when you need it.The key itself is a delightful folding affair,which – like almost everything else carries the Gazelle brand.

Accessories

If you live in Germany, Scandinavia or The Netherlands,you’ll wonder what all the fuss is about, because most bikes there are sold with essential equipment, but here in the mid-Atlantic MTB-orientated UK,this level and quality of accessories is almost unknown.The Easy Glider has Continental Contact tyres,a Selle Royale gel saddle,a skirtguard, long rack with shock cords,a Power Click stand that looks as though it would support a Harley-Davidson,‘Switch’ handlebar quick-release,giving instant adjustment for height and reach,a full chainguard,tool kit,saddle bag,pump,a smashing rotary bell,rear wheel lock,auto lights,trip computer,and the Nexus 8-speed hub and suspension we’ve already mentioned.Phew.

The bell looks like a gearshift,but rotating it produces a lovely tinkly shop bell noise. The lights are rather nice – a Power Vision battery 5-LED rear light with auto option,and Power Eye front light.This remarkable device fits into a sculpted plastic housing,integral with the forks,with power supplied from a Nexus hub dynamo in the front wheel.As this short section of wire is fully enclosed,the system is effectively cable-free.Output is excellent,as one might expect from this state-of-the-art job,and the auto functions are less sensitive than some,and generally unobtrusive.Our only grumble is that when you first start off,the front light doesn’t get going until you reach 10mph or so,presumably because it’s charging the standlight.On the other hand,after you’ve ridden a mile or two,the standlight gives full output for a couple of minutes when you stop.

Typical of Dutch roadsters,the Easy Glider has quite a large frame.Gazelle offers small,medium and large step-thru models and a gents,only in large.But as our small stepthru sample gave a saddle height from 91 – 105cm,which suited pretty well everyone who tried the bike,that’s the one to go for,unless you’re safely over six foot.

On the saddle,a neat quick-release gives instant adjustment of the saddle angle,while another adjusts the bar reach and height (112cm – 118cm on the small frame).The speedometer offers only mileage,trip miles and average speed,which is mildly disappointing,but it’s adequate for most purposes.As with the ride,there isn’t much else to say – the bike is equipped for mud,rain,snow,darkness,minor repairs,and of course, getting the shopping home.And you can wear whatever you like without getting wet, muddy or oily.Every home should have a Dutch roadster.

Conclusion

This is undeniably one of the best machine we’ve seen. It has it’s faults: the weight might be a problem, it’s low geared, and the battery is small. But these really are minor niggles. The Easy Glider may weigh 28kg, but there’s not a gramme of flab on it,and indeed, for a bike so laden with accessories,it’s really quite light.The gearing is easily fixed for a fiver,and a second battery solves the mileage problem,although bear in mind that higher gearing will tend to use more power,reducing the range even more.

Would we pay £1,400 for the Gazelle? Not long ago we thought £900 was a lot for a bicycle,but if you want a machine with this level of equipment,plusthe ability to climb hills, you do have to pay a bit more.It isn’t quite as lively as the Lafree,but it’s better equipped, better made,and not that much more expensive.Against the competitors in this price bracket,it does extremely well.If you want speed rather than equipment,go for the Ezee F-series or Torq.Otherwise,apart from a few specialist imports,it’s Giant Twist 1.0, Heinzmann Estelle and Sparta Ion,all at around £1,400.The Giant we would tend to dismiss on all counts except range,the Heinzmann is good,but not Gazelle-good,leaving only the Ion:a faster,prettier bike,but without the equipment or hill-climbing capabilities. For our money,the Gazelle is best of the bunch.A new 5-star electric bike,in other words.

Gazelle Easy Glider Specifications

Gazelle Easy Glider £1,460. Weight Bike 26.3kg Battery 1.93kg Total 28.2kg (62lbs) Gears 8-spd Shimano Nexus hub .Gear Ratios 25″ – 78″ .Battery Li-ion Manganese Nominal Capacity 187Wh. Replacement Cost £209 . Maximum Range 24 miles Full Charge 4 hrs 40 mins. Consumption 9.9Wh/mile. Running Costs 11.5p/mile Emissions <3.3gCO2/km. Manufacturer Koninklijke Gazelle www.gazelle.nl . UK: Electric Cycle Co (stockist) tel 0131 553 4900 mail sales@electriccyclecompany.co.uk Cambridge Dutch Bikes (to order) tel 07772738899 mail enquiries@dutchbike.co.uk

A to B 61 – Sep 2007

Loading

Bicycle Skirt Guard Review

Bicycle Skirt Guards – A to B 61, September 2007

Skirt guard - A to B

The Sprint

Splash Bicycle Skirt Guard Review

The Splash

Butterfly Bicycle Skirt Guard Review

The Butterfly

Original article from A to B 61 September 07

Skirt guards play an essential role in keeping loose clothing – from dresses and skirts to coats and scarves – out of the rear wheel spokes,so they’re not entirely about women and not entirely about skirts. If you carry a child in a rack-mounted child seat, or an occasional adult on the rack itself, a guard will also help to keep questing fingers and toes out of the spokes. And they can help to cut spray from the rear tyre, quite a lot of which emerges sideways in bad weather.

They disappeared from English machines some forty years ago, when we still made real bicycles, and real ladies still rode them. From the 1970s,the British market became a place of tasteless Chinese MTBs equipped with mudguard-less knobbly tyres and not much else. You strapped a couple of these to the Discovery, roared off to the country park, and if you were silly enough to get caught any distance from the car when it rained, your skin-tight fluorescent Lycra got all wet and muddy, reinforcing your view that bicycles were only practical for fine weather and leisure rides. On the near Continent, the bicycle developed altogether differently. People rode to work, to the shops and to school, and they expected to do it in their everyday clothes. Skirt guards (dress guards in Europe) remained common, as indeed did lights, mudguards, bells, stands and all the other essentials.

But through the wilderness years, demand persisted in Britain, with ladies establishing secret supply routes from Continental purveyors. A handful of ‘real’ bike shops kept selling proper accessories too, and if you want to find one of these treasure troves, most of them advertise in A to B. One such establishment is Bicycle Workshop in west London, run – quite coincidentally – by a delightful lady called Ninon,one of the country’s key authorities on hub gears, and thus a frequent visitor to these pages.

A few months ago, a Sunday paper happened to mention that Bicycle Workshop kept skirt guards and the shop was inundated with grateful ladies, battering down the doors with their stiletto heels. All right, we made that bit up,but people certainly travelled from far and wide, and Ninon is now regarded as something of an authority on skirt guards,and so we test her current selection here. A word of warning, if you are considering a mail order purchase: most guards are designed to fit the classic Dutch roadster and may take some adaptation to fit to anything else, unless you happen to have a forty-year-old ladies roadster made in Birmingham, as we do.

Sprint (also Gist) – £8

The guard is a sort of squashed fabric umbrella that pulls down over the mudguard. It weighs next to nothing, it’s relatively cheap and it keeps clothing out of the spokes,but don’t expect the fabric to protect children’s fingers. Fixing is by elasticated straps which hook over the hub axle. This will not work with all hub gear bikes, and the fit of the guard is dictated by the position of mudguard clips – there wasn’t enough room on our Lafree. On the positive side, fitting and removal take a matter of seconds.

Splash – £15

The Splash is a much more sophisticated affair,with smoked plastic side panels that hook over the mudguard lip at three points,and are fixed to the seat stays with clips.It’s well made and looks good on the bike,but is designed for 28inch wheels and metal mudguards,neither of which are common in the UK. That said,it fitted adequately onto the plastic mudguards and 26-inch wheels of the Lafree,but with a slightly distorted look.The plastic guards are relatively flexible,so not the best for children,but they cover a big arc of wheel.The Splash comes with a choice of 16mm or 20mm fittings,and these can be used with or without rubber sleeves to suit most steel frame tubes and thin alloy tubes.

Butterfly – £15

Because the Butterfly is made from more rigid plastic,it comes in four pieces,with two each side, fitting in front and behind the wheel lock and/or dynamo. The more rigid material makes this the safest guard, but it’s also the fiddliest and slowest to fit,with little metal clips that firmly grasp the mudguard.The Butterfly looked fine with 26-inch wheels,and because of the two-piece assembly,should fit 28-inch too.The only weakness is that the fitting kit only came with 16mm stay clips,so we had to borrow the 20mm ones from the Splash to fit it to our alloy Lafree.This isn’t entirely satisfactory,because the neat clip covers are designed for 16mm clips,so they won’t fit properly on the bigger ones. But we liked it,and would probably choose this one as the most substantial,and arguably,the prettiest skirt guard.

Other designs come and go, according to availability. Mail order p&p £5, or visit the shop, but fitting must be booked in advance.
Bicycle Workshop
tel 020 7229 4850

A to B 61 September 07

Loading

Brompton Folding Bike Rear Frame Clip Review

Brompton Retrofit Rear Frame Clip

Brompton Rear Frame Clip ReviewBrompton frame clip. Originally published in A to B 61 – September 2007

Whatever your views on the slightly esoteric argument about which is the best folding bike in the world, you can’t deny that Brompton’s engineering expertise is absolutely first class. In this latest upgrade, they’ve performed a loaves and fishes style miracle by adding features without adding any weight.

There are two styles: new bicycles are already being made with a lighter seat clamp, that works more smoothly and holds the seat post tighter. This more complex quick release/rear frame clip version is now a £10 option, but from January 2008 it will become a standard fitting,with the lightweight clamp as a discount option. Got all that?

The frame clip version weighs about a gram more than the old-style clamp, but it incorporates a little clip assembly that can be set to stop the rear frame folding down when you lift the bike. We’ve never really seen the point in this, because once you get used to the sagging rear frame, it’s a real convenience, but a locking pivot can be useful if you regularly load up a rear rack. In any event,the public wanted one, so the company has obliged.

As we’ve come to expect, the engineering of the levers,springs and other widgets is superb. We rarely read instructions, but this was an exception, because fitting can be a bit puzzling. Once in place and adjusted (about 15 minutes), the bike works as normal until you turn the rubber suspension block around (yes,they supply an anti-friction washer) until a little groove points upwards (you could do it in the dark). In this position, a little clip catches the suspension bush, enabling you to lift the bike in conventional fashion.

Everything works with satisfying clunks and clicks,and the new basic clamp is lighter (and cheaper on a new bike), while the clip-type gives you that lovely warm feeling of adding only one gram to the bike. Either type could be a worthwhile upgrade for people with slipping seatposts, because the clamping action is much improved as well. We’ve tried other rear frame clips, some Heath Robinson, and some rather elegant, but none works quite so well, and none does the loaves-and-fishes bit.In the end, bikes like the Brompton will get copied in the developing world, but it’s these little design touches that make the British bike excel – this is a development in the best Brompton tradition.

Quick-release £11.62 Quick-release/frame clip £21(£10 with new bikes) . From all good dealers

A to B 61 – Sep 2007

Loading

Nano Brompton Electric Bike

Electric Bromptons: Nano versus Brompton

nano-electric-bromptonThis is our June 2007 Nano review.
Our 2017 road-test of the Brompton Electric versus the Nano can be downloaded in A to B 117!
For a briefer look at the characteristics of the December 2018 production Brompton Electric, we have a short road-test in A to B 122

ORIGINAL STORY FROM JUNE 2007. The Nano later ceased production, but returned in revised form in early 2012, with a different battery and repositioned electronics. Prices are very different to those quoted here.

We’ve championed electric bikes since they first appeared, but somehow folding electric bikes have always proved a technological leap too far. Some are woefully underpowered, others have a limited range, all are bulky, and some are monstrously heavy. Our line has consistently been, don’t buy one. A good conventional folder is lighter, cheaper and more enjoyable to fold and ride, because by and large – the available electric machines add nothing to the capabilities of a good unpowered bike. This changed slightly with the arrival of the Dahon Roo EL, which showed what could be done with a good folding bike and quality power-assist system, but it was a bit weak and very expensive. Back to the drawing board. What is a folding electric bike actually for, you might ask? Some would consider it no more than something to throw in a car boot for a powered trundle round the park, but more usefully, it is (or could be) a priceless weapon for extending the door-to-door capabilities of public transport. For the average person on foot, the realistic range from a railway station might be a mile. On a folding bike, this increases to five miles – or perhaps ten in favourable conditions – but if there was a machine that most people could ride swiftly and with relative ease for twenty or thirty miles in an hour or two, almost any inhabited area of the United Kingdom would be in easy reach of almost any other. That’s the dream, and with the Nano Brompton – a kit produced by Tony Castles of EGO – it has become a practical reality.

Nano Technology

This machine has been a long time coming. We had some small involvement at the beginning of the project, talking through ideas and bringing a few engineers together, but the trail then went rather quiet. In the background, electronics boffin Tony Castles was working away, sourcing equipment and putting miles on the bikes. Prototypes have been out and about for a few months now, but our test bike is the first that could accurately be called a preproduction machine. The Nano Brompton will be available in kit form to convert an ordinary Brompton, the package including widened forks, a motorised front wheel, and controller for £250, plus battery of your choice (ours is a typical 266Wh lithium polymer costing another £250. The battery is usually mounted in the front pannier bag, with power passing, cleverly, through the front carrier block to reach the motor. The beauty of this elegant solution is that although the power-assist kit adds more than 6kg to the weight of a typical Brompton, the weight is evenly split between the bag and the bike. Our fairly typical donor L3 weighed 11. 3kg before conversion, and 14. 4kg afterwards, plus about 4. 4kg for the front bag. That’s quite a lot to carry up a flight of stairs, but much, much easier than the alternatives.

And, if you can afford to convert a new S2LX, you might be looking at a bicycle weighing only 12. 8kg, which is lighter than most un-assisted folding bikes. You need a battery, of course, but there’s no need to go for the whole pannier/battery option – we’ll come to this. Other bikes have come close to the Nano Brompton on weight, but never on a bike so compact, that goes so far, and does it all so damn effortlessly. The Nano Brompton has its quirks, but in the dysfunctional world of folding electric bikes, it’s close to miraculous.

Key Components

Kits can be bad news for the uninitiated, and on the Brompton, things like cableruns and the precise alignment of bits and pieces are rather critical to avoid folding tangles. So although the kit is supplied with clearly illustrated instructions, we wouldn’t recommend fitting it unless you have reasonable engineering skills, and a good understanding of how and why the Brompton folds the way it does. It took us about four hours, including two dashes to the computer to ponder the illustrations, particularly concerning the motor cable exit, where a lot happens in a small space. Nevertheless, once fitted, it worked right out of the box, and worked rather well.

The key component is the Nano – a new breed of sensor-less brushless motor. Just to recap very quickly:older DC motors (Powabyke, for example) have mechanical brushes and are only so-so efficiency-wise, newer ‘hall-effect’ motors (almost everything else) replaced the brushes with little sensors in the motor, linked by a fat cable to electronic switches in a separate control box. The sensors tell the switches when to fire, spinning the motor. These devices can be very efficient, but if one of the tiny wires breaks, they’re out of action that’s a big problem on a folding bike, where cables can have a hard time.

On the Nano, the sensing is done by a clever feedback system, so the motor only needs three small power wires. A slight oddity is that the Nano gives three little kicks before the sensing system settles down, producing a brief rattle, but the noise is followed by absolutely silent power. This is possible because of another technological advance – the whining (howling in some cases) sun and planet gears common to most electric bike drives have been replaced by a group of rollers. The old Yamaha PAS used something similar, but it made a few noises:the Nano Brompton is silent. On a very quiet road, pulling hard at low speed, the motor makes a tiny hum, but to put this into perspective, it’s quieter than the soft ‘shshsh’ of the over-run clutch when the motor is turned off. In practice, you can ride with a group and no-one would guess that there was anything unusual about the bike, except for the control box on the handlebars, the larger than usual front hub, and the fact that the rider apparently has bionic legs.

On the road

Brompton Nano graph

So what’s it like to ride? Plonk the bag in place, and if the battery is inside and turned on, a movement of the twistgrip will give instant assistance, so you need to take care. The twistgrip is supposed to be on the right, but we fitted in on the left, allowing throttle-on gear changes, although this does leave the control working backwards, so even greater care is needed when mounting and dismounting. We’d like to see a safety switch in a nice accessible position.

Engage first gear, open the throttle, and with that characteristic tiny rattle, the motor engages and pulls cleanly away. Power seems limited at first, but the motor gets into its stride from around 9mph, pulling with a startling amount of torque just at the point where your acceleration would normally be slackening off. The silent waft of power keeps coming until just over 14mph, when assistance suddenly ceases, the bike reverting back to being a conventional, if slightly heavy, Brompton. Most riders will go faster if conditions allow, but when the next hill approaches, you simply reopen the throttle. At first, nothing seems to happen, but as speed falls below 13mph, the motor begins to pull, silently and without fuss. And that’s all there is to it.

Maximum assisted speed is barely more than 14mph (13mph as the battery approaches empty), but this ability to climb rolling hills at 12 or 13mph results in surprisingly fast journey times. Our ten-mile commute takes 37 minutes, which is about average for an electric bike, and on the fast side for a conventional bike – three minutes faster than the unassisted Brompton S2LX, for example.

Not very exciting? Our commuter route is largely flat, in a Dorsetshire sort of way the Nano Brompton only really comes into its own in hills. Once the gradient has pulled speed down to 10mph, the motor begins to really pull. Oddly, but not uniquely, the Nano averages a higher speed in hilly country than it does on the flat (14. 7mph against 14. 2mph). On these more serious gradients, it just knuckles silently to the task, climbing more or less anything you put in front of it – not particularly fast, but at a good steady pace. On longer gradients, the kindest technique is to put the Brompton in gear two and keep speed down to a steady 10mph or so by adjusting the throttle, which takes some practice. On really steep hills, just open the throttle, select first and power on up. We found a restart on a 1:6 hill very easy, despite a little wheelspin, and the bike is soon romping away at 7 or 8mph. The maximum gradient depends on the number of gears available and the amount of muscle power you can provide. A typical cyclist should find 1:5 fairly straightforward and 1:4 seems possible, provided it isn’t too long. Incidentally, putting all this torque through the front wheel doesn’t cause the slightest instability, even with 16inch wheels.

Range

In the past we’ve tested folding electric bikes that went 16 miles (disappointing), 12 miles (hopeless), five or six miles (waste of space), and so on. They tend to have lightweight batteries, poor gearing so you can’t put any effort in, short cranks, tiny wheels and squidgy tyres. This is the first time we’ve tried one with quality free-running tyres, a decent-sized battery (266Wh lithium-polymer) and efficient motor. It looked as though the Nano Brompton was going to go a long way on a charge, but just how far? After gobbling up our 14-mile hilly course in the morning, we kept going after lunch. . . and ended up going, and going. At 20 miles it passed the maximum endurance of the Giant Lafree and other efficient but under-batteried electric bikes. At 22 miles (still averaging 14. 3mph) it passed the ‘muscle’ bikes, such as the Ezee Torq. At 30 miles it passed the ‘big bike being ridden with economy in mind’ barrier. At 35 miles (and still averaging a healthy 14mph) it passed the big, heavy, crude machines like the Powabyke. At around 40 miles, power began to wilt quite significantly, bringing the average speed down below 14mph, but the Nano Brompton just kept right on going. Not very fast, admittedly, but powering up hills at a steady 8mph when requested. We’d love to have seen 50 miles, but in fact the bike cut out at 47. 9 miles, having averaged 13. 4mph for just over 3 1 / 2 hours. In ten years testing electric bikes of all kinds, we’ve only beaten that once, and then only very marginally. In June 2001, the special longrange version of the Dawes S-Drive did 48. 9 miles at exactly the same 13. 4mph average speed. And that had a battery weighing 8. 2kg. The new Giant Twist (tested in A to B58 ) is supposed to go 40 miles on a charge, but it’s so slow, quite frankly you’d die of boredom before finding the limit.

We should put our figures in perspective because if you don’t pedal the Nano Brompton, you might see less than 20 miles, and if you pedal with limited enthusiasm, you might see only 30 miles. On the other hand, the sky’s the limit for maximum range, because it’s a nice bike to ride unassisted, so on a sunny day in East Anglia it might go 50 miles on a charge, or 100 miles, and so on. We try to ride all power-assisted bikes in the same way:at the sort of gentle pace a reasonably fit person could expect to keep up all day. What this tells us is that if you ride the Nano Brompton in that fashion, with power engaged for about 2/3rds of the time, but the motor only working really hard on hills, you can expect to see in excess of 40 miles.

When the battery is flat, you keep riding, and the bike effectively reverts to being an ordinary Brompton. We found that the over-run clutch in the motor caused a little drag at first, but this disappeared after a few miles. At 14. 7mph, the roll-down speed is excellent for a bike with 16-inch wheels.

Recharging takes about five hours. The charger is fairly compact, and weighs only 540 grams, so it’s easy to carry with you. Overall fuel consumption (including charger losses) works out at 7. 7Wh/mile – a tiny figure, and easily the lowest consumption we’ve seen. Running costs (including the depreciation cost of a donor Brompton) come out at a lowish 7. 8p/mile, boosted by the generous range per change.

Folding

Whip the bag off, and the bike folds like an ordinary Brompton. It’s about 3cm wider at 32cm, but the other dimensions – 61cm long and 58cm height are typical. The result is a folded volume of 113 litres, or exactly 4 cubic feet. The only other folding electric bike to even register on the radar is the Dahon Roo EL with a volume of 210 litres or 7. 5 cubic feet. Almost twice the size.

The Nano is seriously practical and compact stuff – when you get to the bus stop, the railway station or the office, you’re left holding one bag weighing 4. 4kg (plus your luggage, of course), and a bike weighing another 14. 4kg. You wouldn’t want to run up stairs carrying it, but you wouldn’t with most ordinary folding bikes either. What most people should be able to do is lift the bike into a car boot, or across a railway bridge and onto a train. It isn’t light, but it’s better by an order of magnitude than anything else. This one works.

If you like to travel really light, use a smaller battery. Tony has been testing a tiny 76Wh battery pack that clips on the front carrier block in place of a bag, so your luggage will have to go in a backpack. This weighs 1. 2kg, and although we haven’t tested it to destruction, we think it should be good for ten miles or so, which might be enough for the sort of journey you do. You could keep one of these at the office and one at home, or. . . well, you get the idea, and the bike and battery then weigh only 15. 6kg. Basically, you choose a battery that suits your lifestyle and biceps.

The ability to fold to nothing and and pop on and off the train is priceless. We found quite quickly that the motor was well up to the task of assisting our SP trailer bike, producing a unique three-wheel-drive machine. For us, this makes all sorts of longer train-assisted journeys practical with an eightyear-old, where traffic or gradients would make solo riding impractical.

Conclusion

Where exactly is the competition supposed to come from? The only other decent electric folder is the Dahon Roo, which weighs 18. 1kg complete with battery. That’s more or less the same weight as the Nano Brompton and front pannier bag, but the Dahon offers only (only!) 20-mile range and rather dismal performance. It also costs £1, 199, which is a lot of money for what it is and – more importantly – what it does. We have some sympathy with the Ezee Quando, which climbs hills with remarkable vigour, but is otherwise rather a lump. The rest can be dismissed.

What we can’t tell you is whether Tony will be able to satisfy demand, or whether the Nano will prove reliable in the long run. We’ve had it for a few weeks and ridden a threefigure mileage. A few advance models have been out and about for a matter of months, but no-one really knows how the innovative motor and control system will survive in the notoriously brutal cut-and-thrust of commuting.

All we can say for sure is that it’s a delightful little beast. It does everything it’s claimed to do, plus a bit more, and it offers great value for money. At £499, the motor/battery kit is in the same sort of price bracket as the utter rubbish, yet it’s a smashing bit of kit, comparable in performance to the Heinzmann and other systems costing £800 . Even with a new Brompton M3L, the total comes to only £1, 000 (although you may have to pay someone to fit it). But enough superlatives. If you’re looking for a folding electric bike, take a closer look at the Nano. We trust you will not be disappointed.

Nano Brompton Specifications

Nano Brompton £499 (kit only) . Weight Bike 14.4kg Battery and Pannier 4.4kg Total 18.8kg (41lbs) Gears typically 3-spd Sturmey Archer hub . Gear Ratios 49″, 65″, 87″ . Folded Dimensions H58cm L61cm W32cm . Folded Volume 113 litres (4 cu ft) . Battery Li-pol . Nominal Capacity 266Wh Max Range 48 miles . Full Charge 5hrs . Consumption 7. 7Wh/mile inc charger losses . Running Costs 7. 8p/mile Manufacturer EGO www. egopt. co. uk tel 07974 723996 mail tony@egopt. co. uk

A to B 60 – June 2007

Loading

Dahon Curve SL Folding Bike

Dahon Curve SL

Dahon Curve SL Folding BikeFirst published in A to B  60 – June 2007

Readers may or may not be surprised to hear that Dr Hon thinks A to B has something of a Brompton bias. Fair comment? We tend to find that those who adore the Brompton are happy with our coverage, and those who don’t are either suspicious or grudgingly accepting. For years , Dahon UK, fronted by Mark (son of Harry) Bickerton came into the latter category – Mark was wily enough to understand that if we did show signs of bias, our readers would soon give Dahon free publicity by complaining. This all changed last year when big cycle distributor Fisher Outdoor Leisure was given the Dahon account. Soon after, we picked up a whisper that a Fisher’s rep had been pushing the Curve, ‘nudge nudge, wink wink’ as a ‘Brompton Killer’. Great stuff. We duly passed it on (Mole, A to B 56), but a few months later, in November 2006, a furious Fishers settled on a policy of noncooperation with non-compliant magazines. The company would now invite ‘impartial independent reviewers’ to test Dahon bikes, and distribute these (presumably favourable) reviews to magazines willing to accept such ‘advertorial’. A to B , said Chris Raven of Fisher, ‘…compared every single other model out there to the Brompton. Most of the models in Dahon’s range have very little comparative relevance to the Brompton’. True, maybe, but in the case of the Brompton Killer, the comparison had come from Fisher, not us. And, whatever the company spokesperson might say, the Curve is undeniably a Brompton clone.

The Dahon Curve

You’ll be glad to hear that we’ve overcome these Stalinist restrictions by obtaining a Curve SL independently. We’ll do our best to conduct an independent and impartial review before the commissars cart us off to the Gulag. First, let’s look at price. The basic Curve model is the DL, with 3-speed hub and rear rack for a very reasonable £350, undercutting the basic Brompton C3E by £45 and the more comparable M3L by over £200.

The more upmarket Curve SL sells for £550, putting it right in the middle of a bevy of Bromptons – about the same as the basic 3-speed models, but much cheaper than the 6-speed. Significantly, it’s also £100 cheaper than the Mezzo d9, which in terms of looks and aspirations is probably its closest competitor. The SL comes equipped with a Sturmey Archer 5-speed hub, and has no rack, which superficially seems a bit of an omission for an extra £200. On the other hand, it’s lighter,and painted a snazzy battleship grey, rather than any-colour-you-like-as-long-as-it’s-red. So both the cheaper bike and the sexier lightweight demonstrably undercut the British bike. Round One to Dahon.

Weight is slightly less clear-cut. The SL is claimed to weigh 9.9kg, but our scales say 10.8kg. That’s some way off the claim, but a full kilogram lighter than the Mezzo D9. As for the Brompton, it’s a bit hard to judge, because no models are strictly comparable. The lightest Bromptons are lighter, but they only have two gears and cost twice as much as the SL. A more typical £600 Brompton would weigh 11 or even 12kg, so the Curve SL has a small advantage in this field as well, although the 12.6kg DL is heavier than all but the chunkiest Bromptons. It isn’t exactly a knock-out, and may have to be decided on points, but it seems Round Two goes to Dahon.

Adjustability

Saddle height has always been a weakness with the Brompton, although the company can provide a choice of seat-pillars to suit individual riders, and recent changes have increased the wheelbase, making the bike feel much roomier. The Curve has bars adjustable from 90-102cm, but we’re not sure they’re worth the complication, as we kept our test bike at the maximum throughout. More usefully, the saddle goes up to 103cm, which is higher than a standard Brompton, but shorter than Brompton’s optional extended seat posts. Oddly though, the 103cm height of the Curve saddle is lower than it appears because the bike has a strangely high bottom bracket, giving the pedals 12cm of ground clearance. We can’t imagine why they would want to do this, but it forces the rider to put the pillar higher than normal to get a decent riding position.The Dahon also loses out in having a much shorter wheelbase – only 97cm, against 105cm for the new Brompton. That’s a huge difference, and it makes the Taiwanese bike feel choppier on the bumps and generally more cramped. The Dahon should win this category with its higher saddle and adjustable bars, but we don’t think it does.

“…it lacks zip, pep, call it what you like, but we came home grumbling rather than smiling…

On the Road

On the move, we felt the Dahon was completely overshadowed by the Brompton. Why? We’re not really sure. The slightly smaller wheels and wider, low-pressure tyres don’t help, but the Curve’s Schwalbe Big Apples are actually quite good, giving a roll-down speed of 14.3mph, which is excellent for 305mm tyres. The SL’s Sturmey 5-speed hub certainly imparts a bit of ‘stiction’ into the drive: they’re nice hubs, but there’s a distinct resistance in first and fifth gears. Frame flex? Well, it bends more than the Brompton, particularly side to side, where the Curve’s tall thin frame tubes count against it, but this only shows up when you’re really pulling on the bars. After looking over the Curve and the Brompton quite carefully, we concluded that the Curve’s high bottom bracket was part of the problem. You need to ride with the saddle much higher than you expect, and this is enough for most people to have difficulty in putting down power on hills. Whatever the reason,the Curve doesn’t possess that essential ‘feel-good’ factor on the road. It isn’t painfully slow – our ten-mile ride took a fairly typical 44 minutes – but it’s slower than a Brompton or a 20-inch Dahon,and the effect is most noticeable on hills, little hillocks feeling like the Alps.

Whatever the reason, we felt it lacked zip,pep, call it what you like, but we came home grumbling rather than smiling.

This round, and it’s arguably the most important, goes to Brompton.

Gears and brakes

The Curve comes with 3-speed or 5-speed Sturmey Archer hubs, which are more or less perfect for small folding bikes, but slightly limited against the range of 2-speed, 3-speed and 6-speed hub/derailleur hybrids produced by Brompton. As for gear range, there’s little in it. The Dahon 5-speed has a slight edge, with 225% against the 215% of the Brompton 6-speed, giving evenly spread gears from 38″ to 85″. The Brompton does slightly less well here, but it offers six gears, and the Brompton system is slightly more efficient than the 5-speed dual epicyclic hub on the Dahon,so there’s very little between them in practice. The Brompton certainly wins in terms of gear options, although not everyone is happy with the 6-speed’s twin levers. Neither bike offers very much gear-wise, but on balance, the Brompton set-up is probably more flexible and efficient.

Brakes are an area where Brompton is often criticised, and the Curve’s front and rear V-brakes offer much more powerful braking. This is thanks in part to the use of Jagwire cables, which reduce friction, resulting in a light and precise braking action. The brakes on the Curve are excellent. Unlike many modern V-brakes, there are no power limiting devices, so it’s rather too easy to lift the rear wheel with a front application, or lock it with the rear brake. But for most people, this light action and effortless power is the sort of thing the Brompton has never quite supplied. Another point to Dahon, making three each in total.

…The Curve’s brakes are excellent… Another point to Dahon…

Folding

This is generally regarded as the Brompton’s special feature, with the simpler fold-in-half Dahons coming in a poor second. This still holds true with the Curve, but the small wheels help a great deal, producing a long, low and relatively slim package. The folding process doesn’t take long, but you need to concentrate, something that isn’t really an issue with the Brompton, which can be folded at night, or in a thick fog, or while completely blotto, or all three. The Dahon handlebars must be rotated to bring the brake levers and cables up out of the way, then – if the pedals are correctly positioned – the bars can be folded down against the frame, and the frame folded in half. Pedals are the now familiar MKS MTE which simply pop out when you squeeze a ring on the shaft. Actually, it seems they’ve been popping out a bit too easily, because they now come with a fiddly plastic ring, which needs to be removed before the pedals will come off. More cavalier owners will chuck it away on Day One, which MKS no doubt appreciates.

The folded package now measures 67.5cm tall x 76.5cm long x 34cm wide,giving a volume of 176 litres, or six cubic feet. That’s getting on for twice the Brompton volume, and slightly bigger than the Mezzo. The package can be significantly lowered by removing the saddle stem and storing it between the frame halves, reducing the height to 52cm and the volume to 134 litres or 4.8 cubic feet. That’s still some way from the Brompton volume, but usefully lower,which can be very handy (the Brompton stands 58.5 cm tall). Unlike the Brompton, the package doesn’t lock in the folded position, but two little magnets come together, which is enough to hold the frame halves in place, but they’re not secure enough to, for example, run down a railway platform carrying the bike.

Where folding is concerned, the Curve is the clear loser. It’s lighter than most Brompton variants, which helps, but it’s bigger and more likely to fall apart once folded.

Accessories

The Curve comes with a stand, nice big efficient mudguards and (on the cheaper 3-speed) a rack. This is broadly similar spec to the Mezzo, but it’s difficult to make comparisons with the Brompton, which doesn’t need a stand, and can be supplied with a rack, but doesn’t really need one of those either, most purchasers opting for the luggage system. So any comparison is likely to be in the area of options, which the Brompton positively drips with, from an ever-widening frame colour range,to dynamo or LED lights (now fitted as standard),alternative tyres,and that custom luggage system with a choice of neat bags. Dahon produce many interesting accessories, but very little targeted at the Curve, suggesting a slightly half-hearted assault on Brompton’s core commuter market. The key thing the Curve does have (now fitted to all Dahon models) is a little frame lug designed to take the Rixen & Kaul KLICKfix luggage system. This is similar to the Brompton carrier system: with a plate screwed to the frame you can fit a huge range of bags, from ‘small pet’ carriers to wicker baskets and panniers. Strangely though, Dahon doesn’t seem to have capitalised on this innovation. Bikes are not being sold with the KLICKfix adapter (0211R) and plate, so you need to buy the whole kit before you can carry luggage Brompton-style. There’s also a slight issue with the brake and gear cables,which would be obstructed by a large pannier. None of the dealers we contacted knew anything about the carrier plate or bags, and we had to do our own research.In fact,the adapter and plate only cost £11.40, although some of the luggage (like Brompton luggage) can be expensive. By contrast, Bromptons now come pre-fitted with a carrier block,and the company supplies a range of classy and practical bags.The Dahon system is certainly a great advance, but tracking it down has proved difficult, and we’ve yet to see one in action, leaving the Brompton to win this category by default.

Conclusion

Perhaps A to B doth protest too much, but for a machine that shouldn’t be compared with the Brompton, the Curve seems skillfully targeted at Brompton customers. In some ways it really is better: Price, weight and braking efficiency go to the Curve, but folding, rideability, gears and accessories go to the Brompton. The Curve is a pretty-looking bike, and by far the best 16-inch Dahon yet. And it really might have been a Brompton Killer, if it hadn’t fallen down in a number of key areas. Fisher might argue that we’re not comparing like with like, as the Curve was never intended to be a commuter machine, but that’s not the impression we get from the publicity. Nevertheless, the £350 DL in particular is a good buy if you are looking for something cheaper than a Brompton for leisure use, but we’re not convinced it’s up to daily commuting.

Specification

Dahon Curve SL £500 . Weight 10.8kg (24lbs) . Gears 3-spd Sturmey Archer hub Gear Ratios 38″, 57″, 76″ . Folded Dimensions H67.5cm L76.5cm W34cm . Folded Volume 176 litres (6 cu ft) . Maximum saddle height 103cm . Wheelbase 97cm Manufacturer Dahon  UK Distributor Fisher Outdoor Leisure tel 01727 798345 mail dahon.service@fisheroutdoor.co.uk

A to B  60 – June 2007

Loading

Ezee Liv Electric Bike

Ezee Liv

Ezee Liv Electric BikeBack in the summer of 2003,a slightly odd-looking electric bike called the Ezee Forza landed on our doorstep. It was reasonably light,and some of the equipment was a bit dubious,but it came with everything a regular cyclist might need,plus a gutsy power-assist system that offered a decent range at an enjoyably nippy pace.The prototype Forza was a bit rough around the edges,but we liked it,and the production version (known as the Sprint) sold in droves. It wasn’t the prettiest machine in the world,but it promised to get you up the hills and generally got you to work on time,even when something went wrong, which it occasionally did.

Four years later, Ezee has become a respectable brand,and the Sprint has been extensively revised,using that early experience.Loaded with extras,it now commands a price tag of £800-£900,but with the market for electric bikes expanding rapidly in the £500-£600 zone,Ezee has gone back to basics,introducing the Liv.This new bike is broadly the same as that early Forza:similar equipment,with a similar bare alloy frame,but without the ‘unisex’ 45cm step-thru (the Liv top tube is 67cm high – almost the same as the Torq). The bike was launched a few weeks ago at a distinctly eye-catching price of £545,complete with NiMH battery.

Things move fast in this business:following some dramatic increases in the price of NiMH batteries (reportedly due to a shortage of nickel),it has been decided that the Liv will sell for £595,equipped with the latest lithium-ion battery.So the bike still squeezes into that ‘economy’ banding,but apart from the tiddly little Powacycle Lynx,it seems to be the only bike under £1,000 to be fitted with a lithium-ion battery,and it’s the biggest battery of its kind on the market.

On the road

So the Liv started life as a back to basics model,but has become a high-tech commuter.It still holds true to the Ezee philosophy of simple,practical everyday transport, but with superb spec where it counts.Equipment-wise,the bike comes with full mudguards, a dynamo lighting set (not the best,but it works well enough in dry weather),and – where other cheap brands are fitted with nasty cheap derailleur sets – a Nexus 3-speed hub gear. This light,simple hub is ideal for purpose – changes up or down are very slick,and the gear range (46″,62″ and 85″) is limited,but sufficient on an electric bike.

The DC motor is the same simple reliable unit fitted to the Low-tech Ezee Rider.It’s not as efficient as a brushless motor,but it pulls cleanly and powerfully to 16mph,or even 18mph with a fresh battery.You can cover a lot of ground by spinning fast in that 85-inch top gear,and with reasonable assistance from the noisy,but willing little motor,the Liv will climb quite steep hills at a good speed.The result is an impressively fast bike,completing our 10-mile commuter course in 33 1 / 2 minutes.That’s about the same as the Sprint,and second only to the Ezee Torq,a much more sophisticated (and expensive) machine.It just goes to show what you can do with three hub gears, sensible ratios and some modest power assistance.In hillier country,the bike does equally well,recording an average of 15.7mph with NiMH and 16.9mph with the Li-ion battery over our new 14-mile course.That’s much faster than the other budget electric bikes,and a hefty three to four mph faster than the Giant Twist or Sparta Ion (see A to B 58 ), which cost nearly three times as much.Speed isn’t everything,we hasten to add,but as with a car,it makes sense to have something in reserve.Sooner or later you’ll be climbing a gradient into a headwind with a bad leg.

With only three gears,the maximum gradient is a bit limited,but we found 13% (1:8) easy enough, and climbed 17% (1:6) at a steady pace.Restarting on that sort of gradient is feasible,but with a 46-inch bottom gear,this obviously takes a bit of legwork. Maximum motor output is similar to the Sprint,at a shade under 600 watts,so there’s plenty of oomph for most situations.

More for you money

If you’re searching for a budget-priced,practical electric bike,it’s the battery that counts, and the Liv offers no less than 370Wh of lithium-ion power – exactly the same battery fitted to its more expensive cousins.With the older NiMH battery,range in hilly country is 23 miles,but with the new battery we recorded a range of 27 miles,still averaging 16mph, despite plenty of hills and some town work.Remember,that’s at quite a high speed – if you keep speed down,30+ miles should be well within its capabilities.

When the battery does conk out,the Liv is a pleasant bike to ride unassisted – not quite up to Lafree standards,but perfectly rideable.At 28.5kg,the Liv weighs the same as the Sprint,give or take a few grams.That’s 4kg heavier than the new breed of lightweights like the Windsor,but 10kg lighter than most £600 electric bikes.And this is a solid machine, offering more range and a great deal more speed than most,particularly on hills.

Fuel consumption of 15Wh/mile is a little on the high side,but extremely good for an electric bike with this sort of performance. The charger is a quality fan-cooled device (two speed,no less!),and quite rapid,reaching half capacity in two hours and full in just over five.A few words of warning,as we’re still slightly suspicious of Li-ion technology.Our battery refused to charge at first,and although it settled down quickly enough,it would still occasionally turn off early.Switch the mains power off and back on,and it runs to full charge,but if you’re commuting some distance,we’d suggest doing this as a matter of course before going to bed…With Li-ion,both the battery and charger contain a mass of complex electronics,and one theory is that ‘spikes’ in the mains supply cause the charger to ‘trip-out’.On the other hand,we’re not hearing negative reports from consumers,so they must be working well enough out in the field.Running costs are 7.1p/mile.That’s quite high for a budget bike (replacement batteries cost £250),but as cheap as you’ll see for a performance machine with a Li-ion battery.

Conclusion

At £595,the Ezee Liv has a lot of competition,but most of these machines (and quite a few costing £700 or more) can be dismissed.Against such single-speed,overweight monsters as the Powabyke Shopper,Sakura Cruiser and even more horrible things,the Ezee Liv is light years ahead.The only real competition comes from the Giant Suede and the new LPX versions of the Powacycle Windsor and Salisbury,but (apart from arguably looking nicer and providing a step-thru frame option) their performance and equipment just doesn’t come into the same ballpark as the Liv. Things may change,but at the moment,this is the best all-round machine we have seen:it offers astonishing value,and with saddle height of 86cm-101cm,it fits almost anyone.If you want an electric bike on a budget,don’t hesitate – the Liv is a great buy.

Ezee Liv Specifications

Ezee Liv £595 . Weight Bicycle 24.1kg Battery 4.4kg Total 28.5kg (63lbs) . Gears 3-spd Nexus hub . Gear Ratios 46″, 62″, 85″ . Battery Li-ion . Nominal Capacity 370Wh Max Range 27 miles . Full Charge 5hrs 15mins . Consumption 15Wh/mile inc charger losses Running Costs 7.1p/mile . Manufacturer Ezee Kinetic Co www.ezeebike.com UK Distributor 50Cycles tel 01509 266656 fiftycycles@50cycles.com

A to B 59 – April 2007

Loading

Powacycle Lithium Polymer Battery Review

Powacycle LPX Lithium-Polymer Battery

Powacycle Lithium-Polymer Battery ReviewFIRST PUBLISHED April 2007 in A to B 59

Lithium-Polymer, as readers may recall from the chemistry lesson in A to B 57, is a safer variant of the increasingly common lithium-ion battery. Polymer batteries have been used for a while in mobiles and the like, but big examples are still rare, so we think Powacycle is pretty brave introducing the first Li-pol battery on a budget bike at a budget price (Urban is close on its heels, but at a rather higher price). All the experts agree that these batteries are safe and user-friendly, but there’s no consensus over how long they will last in this sort of environment. The LPX battery can be retrofitted to the Windsor and Salisbury (price to be announced), or specified on either of these bikes from new for an extra £100.

The LPX weighs 2.4kg,against 3.7kg for the old NiMH unit, so it’s easier to carry, and it knocks the overall weight of the bike down to 22.4kg, which is more or less as light as a full-size electric bike gets.

The lithium-polymer battery is claimed to have capacity of 273Wh, against 192Wh for the old version. We only had a few days to try it, but our results of 20.6 miles on a hilly ride (including the notorious 1:5 Ham Hill), and 29.5 miles in easier going, was an improvement, but not the 42% claim. We have to be cautious,because batteries vary with temperature and conditions, but the Li-pol battery went 11%-19% further than the new NiMH and some 40% further than the old one, which has deteriorated quite a bit in 1,000 miles. Despite the larger capacity, the Li-pol charges a little faster than the NiMH unit, taking 4hrs 30 minutes, against 5hrs 10 minutes. And the Windsor felt perkier at 14mph, although this effect seemed to wear off after a few miles.

Is it worth it? If carrying the battery is a problem, it certainly will be,as long as you’re comfortable with the role of technology pioneer. The lithium-polymer battery might fail relatively quickly, or it might last for years – no one really knows. If you’re less concerned about weight and showing off your techie credentials, a spare Powacycle NiMH battery costs only £100, giving a slightly heavier machine,but a range of up to 50 miles. That’s the common sense alternative, but we still suspect the LPX will outsell the NiMH. Powacycle Windsor or Salisbury LPX £599.

A to B 59 – April 07

Loading

Dutch Shopping Pannier Review

Dutch Shopping Pannier

Dutch Shopping Pannier ReviewThis is one of those simple ideas that leaves you wondering why we aren’t all using something similar on a daily basis.It’s a semi-rigid pannier that fits a standard bicycle rack,but instead of buckles and belts,it simply hooks over the frame,hanging much like a conventional pannier by gravity alone. You might expect it to jump off or blow around in the wind,but it doesn’t seem to.

As it only takes a few seconds to lift the pannier on and off the bike,it can be carried into the shops or into the office as a bag or briefcase,then plopped back on the bike,carried home,and straight indoors.No clumsy, time consuming loading and unloading, no ‘double-handling’ collateral damage to delicate items,and a quick getaway assured.

The pannier measures a reasonable 30cm deep by 38cm long and 17cm wide,giving a capacity of about 19 litres.No,we don’t know what that means either.But think of it as about one foot square by 6 inches deep,if that helps,or in terms of supermarket shopping, eight four-pint milk containers.

Dutch Shopping Pannier Review

Note the carrying strap and simple clamps.The Velcro does very little

In practice, the capacity is closer to four milk containers, because the pannier closes with a zip,and if you over-fill it,you can’t do the zip up.This put us off using it on a daily basis for serious shopping,but it remains a firm favourite for the post run,and popping out for odd bits and pieces.Being safely over A4 size, it’s ideal for business meetings,and surprisingly stylish.And for less than £20,it’s pretty good value,even if you only use it occasionally. We’d like to see it redesigned with a couple of integral bungees instead of a zip,and some reflective stripes would be nice, but don’t let that put you off – it’s a useful and practical accessory.

Dutch Shopping Pannier £16.85 (inc post & packing) . DutchBike  mail enquiries@dutchbike.co.uk tel 0031 20 6123819

A to B 59 – April 07

Loading

Sparta Ion Electric Bike

Sparta Ion M-Gear

In The Netherlands,as any small boy will tell you,there are no hills (or very few),but they do get some nasty headwinds out on the polders.Being a great bicycling nation,it is perhaps no surprise that the Dutch are also big manufacturers of power-assisted bicycles. And as a general rule,they design bikes with Dutch conditions in mind – endless,flat, windswept bicycle paths,rather than steep Cornish lanes,for example.

Typical of the genre is the Sparta Ion,a power-assisted roadster which has been selling fiendishly well in its home market for a year or so.Who,you may ask,are Sparta? As in the UK,mainland Europe once had many bicycle companies.Ours were mostly gobbled up and turned into meaningless brand names by Raleigh,while the Continental brands were eaten by something called ATAG, which appears to major on kitchen appliances these days.

In the late 1990s,ATAG ‘hived off’ its bicycle interests under the group name Accell: Sparta is one of the key brands, but Batavus is the biggest,and the group also produces Hercules,Koga-Miyata,and several others we’ve never heard of.Headquarters are in The Netherlands,where the Accell group has nearly 50% of the market,and in marked contrast to the British slash & burn approach, manufacturing plants have remained open in five European countries.Most of the frames are made in the Far East these days,but unlike the ‘British’ Raleigh,an Accell machine can reasonably be described as European.The brands seem to have considerable autonomy,but they benefit from shared technology.Thus,the Sparta Ion power system is also available on the similar Batavus Padova,Koga-Miyata Tesla and Hercules Emove.

Last summer,the Sparta rep visited us at the start of a UKwide dealer tour,and was fully expecting to have the bike on sale here within a few months.Maybe the UK market didn’t seem worth the effort,or perhaps Sparta took on board our dire warning about gradients in the Celtic fringes.Whatever the reason,the project to build a dealer network went quietly onto the back burner.This is still the case,but the Ion is now available through longtime Sparta specialist,Drakes of Cambridge,and Amsterdammers,a small shop in Brighton specialising in secondhand Dutch roadsters.

The Ion is available in several variants,from the steel-framed,single-speed Comfort at £1,250,to the matt black alloy Style,with derailleur gears,no suspension and a £1,720 price tag.The one you’re most likely to see in the UK is the mid-range M-Gear: alloy frame,seven-speed derailleur,suspension and drum brakes for £1,429.This is the bike we’ve tried.Just for the record,this bike (and most variants) also comes with a stand,rack, fitted lights,pump,wheel lock,full chain guard,decent mudguards,Continental City Contact 42 x 622mm tyres,and – very rare in the UK – a skirt guard.

Motor & Controls

Like the BionX,with which the Ion shares a few similarities,the Ion has a direct drive motor,so it’s virtually silent – even quieter and smoother than the BionX,which makes a few gentle noises at low speed.And although the motor spins all the time,it isn’t geared like the new Twist,so there’s no discernable drag.This low-key motor,coupled to an invisible battery pack (it’s in the frame) make the assisted element of the machine very hard to spot.To all intents and purposes,this is a normal Dutch bike,and at 28kg (there a lighter single-speed too),not even precociously heavy.If you want your power assist well disguised (and customer surveys suggest that buyers do ),the Ion is the bike for you.Direct drive motors are also well suited to providing regenerative braking,but the Ion doesn’t have this facility.No hills in The Netherlands,of course.

Lack of regen is a bit disappointing,but the bike is otherwise laden with technology. What the Ion does very cleverly is to make good use of the various sensors,computer capacity, battery and motor that make up the power-assist package.For the first time, these elements are integrated into the bike rather than bolted on as afterthoughts,just as electronics have become an integral part of the modern car.On the handlebars is a round control unit,featuring a speedometer, odometer,battery meter,power switch and light switch.To prevent tampering and keep it safe from the elements when you’re not riding,the control unit simply twists off – the idea being that you take it with you,even if you’re just popping into the corner shop.Removal of this master display will not stop a passing thief half-inching the bike, but the integral wheel lock will,and without the display,the systems are unusable.Each unit is programmed with a unique code,so a potential thief won’t be able to make it work without access to Sparta’s diagnostic plug-in whatnot. Incidentally,we were told that removal of the rear wheel may also make reprogramming necessary – something to think about if you get a puncture.

It’s becoming the norm on electric bicycles to take a feed from the traction battery to run the lights (front,rear and speedometer on the Ion).And in this case the system continues to function when the battery is flat by using the motor as a generator.

The controls are nice and ergonomic.The smaller bits of the liquid crystal display can be hard to read in sunlight,but at night it’s backlit in a sexy blue and much improved. Unlike the Giant Twist,the Ion has just two well separated buttons,one for the lights,and another which clicks through a menu,including a mileometer (kilometre-ometer in this case) and three power levels.There’s also a diagnostic function that tells you when something has gone amiss.The bad news is you can’t do anything about it,but the good news is that your jolly local Sparta dealer will plug it in to his whatnot,reboot it and away you go.In the UK,this means a trip to Cambridge or Brighton,but people have dreamt up stranger excuses for a long weekend.

When the nice man in the Sparta shop plugs in his diagnostic whatnot,he will be able to tell you how far you’ve been,how much effort you’ve used,how far you get on a charge,and much more besides.It’s all a bit Big Brother,but useful in terms of keeping the bike in tip-top condition.Some say the dealer can tweak power levels up or down to suit your riding style,but others deny it.

On the Road

The Ion is available with ladies or gents frames in no fewer than five sizes.Ours is the smallest (46″) ladies frame and it fits more or less everyone,so size should not be an issue…First impressions are of a lithe and lightweight bicycle,which is somewhat illusory, because at 28kg it certainly isn’t light.Nevertheless,it’s reasonably light by electric bike standards,and it feels lively,which is all that really matters.With no appreciable drag from the motor,rolling resistance is more or less conventional for a bike of this type – we recorded a roll-down speed of 14.7mph,which is slightly off the pace,but adequate.Rolldown speed might seem unimportant on an electric bike,but it’s a surprisingly accurate guide to the ‘IT factor’ – whether a bike makes you grin,or grumble.

If you choose to dial in some power assist,you simply set a power level and keep pedalling.With a very gentle surge,the bike then accelerates a bit faster.There’s no noise, no vibration,indeed no suggestion of any kind of intervention.Stop pedalling,and the assist melts away.Lean on the pedal at a junction and nothing happens,but start turning the pedals and the gentle surge returns.With such a quiet motor and unobtrusive assistance, it’s hard to judge the cut-off speed.Sometimes the power has gone by 15mph,but at other times the bike seems to pull to around 17mph or so.Whatever,there’s very little indication of the motor starting or stopping.The only indicator is a ‘fuel’ gauge consisting of a ring of little bars (3% increments) around the speedometer.Like everything else on the bike,this is well thought through,and pretty accurate.

Should you be getting terribly excited that the Ion might be all things to all people, there are a few downsides.With the motor in the back wheel,there’s no room for hub gears,so the Ion has to make do with a cheapish Shimano Nexave derailleur.This limits the gear range,resulting in some rather unhappy compromises.At 37”, first gear is too high for hill climbing,and the 81” top gear is too low for comfortable The Ion is a pretty bike,and with the battery hidden in the curved frame tube,few people would even realise it was assisted cruising.What the bike really needs is something like the Megarange – we don’t know whether this can be shoehorned on,but it would help sell the concept no end,because direct drive motors tend to be weak on hills.

Now,you may be saying,if a motor is no good on hills,what’s it for? A valid point,and the usefulness of this sort of bike depends very much on where you live and how big the hills are.In undulating country,or into modest headwinds,the Ion is great fun.It’s basically just like any other bike,but it goes further and faster for the same effort.Hit a hill,and you’re soon slogging up in that 37-inch gear,which sounds like hard work,but you only have to turn the motor off to prove that it’s still doing a fair bit.Maximum gradient? As with the Giant Twist,it’s hard to put a figure on this,but the Ion is certainly a little weaker. Interestingly,Sparta has promised a more powerful motor for 2008,with sales to the UK and other hillier markets in mind.For now,though,it’s just about up to 1:7 (14%),but it isn’t keen on restarting on this sort of hill,and it won’t climb for long.After a sustained 700 foot climb – not all of it particularly steep – the bike flashs error message E21,which means the motor is overloaded.You don’t need to do anything – the Ion simply backs the power off for a while,but it’s a clear message that this isn’t a hill-climber.Having said that,it still managed 12.4mph in hilly country (the same as the Twist) but it certainly felt less able.

Back in gentler country and you’re soon smiling again.On our largely flat ten-mile test route the Ion did much better than expected,completing the course in 37 minutes – slightly behind the similar BionX,but about as fast as you can go with an 81-inch top gear over that sort of distance.Average speed comes out at 14.7mph (yes,it’s not exactly ten miles),which is pleasantly fast,but not wildly so.

At night,the ‘push of a button’ lights are very welcome,as is the illuminated speedometer – why has this simple innovation taken so long to arrive? Rear light is a typical Busch & Muller LED and the front light a Spanninga Radius with halogen bulb and – nice touch – a Sparta badge.In 2005,we’d have described the Radius as state-of-the-art,but since the arrival of the single LED B&M DLumotec,halogen front lights are merely ‘good’ in our book.

Brakes on our bike are Sturmey Archer drums front and rear.Stopping the bike from high speed takes a mighty heave,but the brakes are powerful,progressive and consistent – just what a cyclist needs.Cheaper models have V-brakes all round,and some others have a Nexus roller brake at the front and Sturmey drum at the rear,but despite the small weight penalty,the double drum package seems the best.The only slight grumble is that the rear drum (made by Sparta,not Sturmey) has a tendency to squeal when cold.

Most Ion models have suspension front forks and a suspension seat post.We’re usually a bit dismissive of this combination,but the components really do work here,giving a supple,comfortable ride.

Range & Charging

Sparta claims an exciting 44 miles in idea conditions,but it’s best to leave these sort of figures to the fairies.In practice,we returned a range of 22 miles in mixed use,falling to 19 miles on a hillier route.The Ion has three power levels – Eco,Normal and Power.We generally rode on the Power setting,but Normal is virtually indistinguishable,and the bike is light and agile enough to be used on Eco for long stretches,provided it’s not hilly,so with care,it would be possible to go a lot further.For all it’s worth,the handbook suggests a range of anything from 7 to 44 miles,which is really hedging their bets…The fuel gauge seems pretty accurate,but it descends a little slowly at first,then more rapidly,the last quarter disappearing in a few miles.This last bit should really be treated as reserve capacity, because after 15 miles,the already gentle motor is rapidly losing oomph.At 14-16Wh/mile,fuel economy is fairly typical for this sort of bike.

When your 22 miles are up,and the power pops off,the display helpfully flashes the code E01,meaning flat battery,but you don’t need the Sparta man to tell you that,because it’s back to muscle power alone.The Ion is quite a pleasant bike to ride unassisted,but with the limited gearing, hills are bound to be a problem.Range can be extended with an optional 168Wh battery pack that slots onto one side of the rear rack,pannier-style. This costs £265,and by our calculations,should extend the range to 32-37 miles.

The standard Ion has a 24 volt NiMH battery of 240Wh,which is a typical sort of size.Replacing the cells will cost £265,which is reasonable,but the main expense is depreciation of the bike,and on such an expensive machine,that pushes up running costs to around 9.6p per mile overall.

The charger is a delight.It’s small (16cm x 12cm x 6cm),light (700g) and with a fast rate of charge,refilling the battery in a little under three hours.A nice touch is that the fuel gauge works it’s way back up,giving a precise indication of the state of play.

With such a compact charger and speedy charge time,this is one of the few bikes you really could top-up over a relaxed lunch.The only problem with the batteries being in the frame is that you need to get the bike to within 3.1 metres of a power point – no carrying the battery into the pub unless it’s the sort of place that lets the bike into the lounge bar. In The Netherlands,this needn’t be a problem,because Sparta has established a network of charge stations at cafes and other public places.Civilised lot,aren’t they?

Conclusion

We are sometimes accused of falling too firmly for or against a particular bike,but there’s no escaping the fact that this is a good ‘un, and thousands of Dutch cyclists have already voted with their wallets accordingly. In Dorchester, the Ion proved something of a surprise hit with just about everyone who tried it.The only grumbles were with the lack of hub gears – unavoidable unfortunately – and the limited hill-climbing ability. Yes, it costs an arm and a leg, but it’s one of the nicest electric bikes around.

Sparta Ion M-Gear Specifications

Specification Sparta Ion M-Gear £1,429 . Weight inc battery 28kg (62lbs) . GearsShimano Nexave Ratios37″-81″ . Wheelbase110cm . BatteryNiMH . Capacity240Wh . Range>19 miles Full charge2hrs 45 min . Fuel Consumption overall 13.6-15.7Wh/mile . Running Costs 9.6p per mile . Manufacturer Sparta B.V. www.sparta.nl/uk . UKagents (Cambridge) Drakes Cycles tel 01223 363468 . (Brighton) Amsterdammers tel 01273 571555

A to B 58 – Feb 2007

Loading